Mubelotix@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agoHot Potato Licensejlai.luimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up11.05Karrow-down17
arrow-up11.04Karrow-down1imageHot Potato Licensejlai.luMubelotix@jlai.lu to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 month agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareuservoid1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up25arrow-down2·1 month agoWhat happen when the repository is getting forked? Goofing with the license is all haha fun till nasty lawyers get into the picture and you get all sort of liability claims
minus-squareImplyingImplications@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up62arrow-down6·1 month agoJust writing words doesn’t make it legally binding. Anyone who reads this comment owes me $1,000,000 USD.
minus-squareogeist@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up40·edit-21 month agoOh shit, what’s your PayPal? Anyone who reads this comment owes me $1,000,000 USD and a kiss
minus-squareoessessnex@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 month agoI don’t have 2 mil, how do I get out of this? File for bankruptcy?
minus-squarePup Biru@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 month agoon a technicality, debts like this are not legally dischargable through bankruptcy
minus-squareRefurbished Refurbisher@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up8·1 month agoAh, the student loan loophole
minus-square🇸🇵🇪🇨🇺🇱🇦🇹🇪🇷@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoWhat’s the opposite of a loophole? That’s what student loans are.
minus-squareSwedneck@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoa legal dick jammed up your hole
minus-squarenarc0tic_bird@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·1 month agoI don’t have the money, can I kiss you twice instead?
minus-squareMartianSands@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoYou declaring a debt isn’t meaningful because you don’t have legal authority to do so. A licence statement is describing in what way you’re granting permission for something you do have the right to control, which makes it meaningful
minus-squarebitfucker@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agoWhat the fuck are you talking about? Do you think the license being used is not legally binding? What constitutes as legally binding to you?
minus-squarenogooduser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agoIf you want to fork the repo then you make a commit to the original repo giving yourself rights then you make the fork and you’re golden.
minus-squareMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoI was gonna say, just make a commit changing the license to something else, like MIT?
minus-squareFaresh@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoI think this is a sort of anti-license, so I think the sort of people who use it reject copyright law.
minus-squareuservoid1@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoSounds like programmers with sovereign citizen approach
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 month ago What happen when the repository is getting forked? You get two code bases with different ownership. That’s a very practical license, that reflects the concept as it is practiced. It’s probably the only one that doesn’t come from an ivory tower.
What happen when the repository is getting forked? Goofing with the license is all haha fun till nasty lawyers get into the picture and you get all sort of liability claims
Just writing words doesn’t make it legally binding. Anyone who reads this comment owes me $1,000,000 USD.
Oh shit, what’s your PayPal?
Anyone who reads this comment owes me $1,000,000 USD and a kiss
I don’t have 2 mil, how do I get out of this? File for bankruptcy?
on a technicality, debts like this are not legally dischargable through bankruptcy
Ah, the student loan loophole
What’s the opposite of a loophole? That’s what student loans are.
a legal dick jammed up your hole
I don’t have the money, can I kiss you twice instead?
You declaring a debt isn’t meaningful because you don’t have legal authority to do so.
A licence statement is describing in what way you’re granting permission for something you do have the right to control, which makes it meaningful
What the fuck are you talking about? Do you think the license being used is not legally binding? What constitutes as legally binding to you?
If you want to fork the repo then you make a commit to the original repo giving yourself rights then you make the fork and you’re golden.
I was gonna say, just make a commit changing the license to something else, like MIT?
I think this is a sort of anti-license, so I think the sort of people who use it reject copyright law.
Sounds like programmers with sovereign citizen approach
You get two code bases with different ownership.
That’s a very practical license, that reflects the concept as it is practiced. It’s probably the only one that doesn’t come from an ivory tower.