Laundry services giant CSC ServiceWorks ignored requests to fix a security bug.

  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 month ago

    Snitches. Let the starving college students wear clean clothes.

    I don’t know if CSC’s response is laziness or compassion.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 month ago

    This article is pointless, I mean it doesn’t even have a step-by-step to make sure no one exploits it. I certainly would never use a bug in software to get free laundry.

    • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sounds like it’s just a super basic program with zero protection. If you can figure out what the “commands” are and how to send em, that’s all you need.

  • agentshags@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Interesting article. I had a good chuckle thinking about college kids getting free clean clothes. The bit about adding several million dollars to their laundry account was also humorous. Too bad the company wiped out their account. They should have just left it there and fixed the security flaw as a way to say thanks for the heads up. Like you saved us a ton of money, keep your several million dollars and have free laundry for life LOL. Not quite the run of the mill security flaw I would have been expecting to read about

  • NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Wait, are CSC Service Works paying for the electric, laundry detergent, etc… or is this just a convoluted way of leasing the use of a washing machine?

  • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    The bad side of this is if someone was to zero out all balances of every user. I wonder if it is possible to do that or just add to the balance. And let’s go worse, sending every balance to negative (because they could be too lazy to check for this).