I’ve heard it thrown around in professional circles and how everybody’s doing it wrong, so… who actually does use it?

For smaller teams

“scaled” trunk based development

    • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 months ago

      Welcome time traveler. If you’re able to return to your own timeline, buy some Apple stock.

      /joking

      But I hope your team does migrate. SVN is pretty bad, compared to git.

    • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Do you really need to make a case? Does your company not trust devs? Is there people leading that have no idea about technology? SVN is dead. Many devs won’t touch it. It’s best way to say to new candidates your company is backwards. Many would refuse to work in a company that uses a version control system that has been dead 7 years.

      • robojeb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        My company still uses SVN, but we have almost 20 years of history in the repository, not including the autogenerated commits from when we migrated from CVS.

        My department would like for us to move to git (some sub projects have) but it’s important for our process to retain the history and nobody has had the time to figure out if the migration would be clean then update all of our auto-testing infrastructure (which itself is over a decade old) to use git, all while not stopping active development.

        • SWW13@lemmy.brief.guru
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          You can use a git client to connect to SVN repo, which is really neat if you have to deal with a SVN repo. Therefore I would assume git has no issues with migrating the history from SVN.

      • KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s effort to switch, and we don’t benefit from having separate copies of the repo bc we’re so small. No one steps on eachother’s toes, so distributed version control isn’t necessary.

        Now, the fact that most devs know git and SVN is dead is not lost on our CTO, but putting the effort to switch over doesn’t provide direct value to the customer, so I have to make the case that switching to git would do enough from a productivity and maintenance standard to effect customers.