• KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    the OCEAN

    yeah that checks out. I’m not surprised people don’t like it. It’s hard to boil things down into a handful of traits. Specifically shorter ones.

    I presume it’s a lot less predatory than the MBTI though. Colleges are even starting to use the MBTI and it’s a huge cash cow for whoever owns that shit now.

    Big five will probably go that way given a long enough period if it isn’t already. I only mentioned it because it seems to be out there about as much as the MBTI lol.

    • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      a lot less predatory than the MBTI though

      You mean the practices surrounding it? I don’t see how a personality index can be predatory in-and-of-itself.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        yeah the practices around it. Technically the test itself can be predatory in the sense that it’s wrong, and people believe that it isn’t.

        Similar things in society have caused far worse outcomes. Notably, antisemitism. Though this isn’t nearly the same thing. People have a propensity to ascribe themselves to labels, or vice versa. And people like existing in groups. Labels are an incredibly easy way to define and arrange people into groups.

        Just being wrong in it of itself isn’t technically predatory though, but once you add in aspects like the MBTI pretending to be credible, suddenly now it becomes a lot more predatory on a personable level.

        you ever taken an online personality test of any kind? Ever notice how it says that it’s just for entertainment and shows no real data/labels? Similar thing there.