I notice a lot of people use terms like “psychotic” or “psychopath” as insults and negative descriptions on here. These are clinical terms that are used to describe real people with difficulties, not boogeymen! I don’t disagree with the sentiment that these people are doing wrong, but if you wouldn’t use the r-slur or “autistic” as an insult (which you shouldn’t) then you shouldn’t use these words either. And I get the idea of calling someone delusional, but take care that you don’t just mean “I disagree with them.” Though by posting on neurodiverse I imagine I’m preaching to the choir.

Sincerely, a casual schizoaffective disorder haver.

  • ProletarianDictator [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 months ago

    Language to go off on someone for being a dickhead that doesn’t catch ND or marginalized people in the collateral is a lot more common than language for telling someone their ideas aren’t good, which all seem to be predicated on insisting they instead actually have a neurological condition that many people struggle with.

    • CupcakeOfSpice [she/her]@hexbear.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      With the added bit of not necessarily being accurate. Even if they do struggle with the condition, that doesn’t mean their idea is bad. The idea being bad is what does.