I’m sure they are working on a youtube messaging app behind the scenes.

  • Arelin@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    finally

    This article is just a youtube premium ad 🤢

    As far as what you get when you go Premium, you won’t see any more ads within the app or the videos that you’re watching. Plus, you’ll gain access to background play, along with being able to download videos on the go. And perhaps what makes this plan even more worthwhile is that you get access to YouTube Music, which features over 100 million commercial free songs. Now, the one drawback is that these features don’t come for free, with a subscription costing $13.99 per month in the US.

      • tb_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        YouTube is testing a feature where it’ll pop up a button to intelligently skip ahead if you skip once, or so I’ve heard.

        That sounds a lot like sponsorblock.

        Though it won’t be fully automatic.

      • Rexios@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        I have premium and SponsorBlock. It doesn’t have to be all or nothing.

    • helenslunch@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I would gladly pay for Premium if it actually gave you a decent user experience but it doesn’t.

      I use 3rd party apps because they don’t fill my feed with garbage content. They just show me what I ask for.

      Not to mention apps like GrayJay that integrate content from other sources in the same app.

      Or that it YouTube does nothing about creators filling content with their own ads.

      I was really interested in Nebula before I glanced at their privacy policy and realized that it has all the same data-mining and selling as every other modern web service.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they hadn’t gotten so obnoxious with ads that it was impossible to use YouTube without blocking them, I wouldn’t have used the vanced/revanced stuff in the first place.

    They find a way to prevent using those, I’m out totally, including on the few devices I didn’t care about playing the ads because it was just background noise.

    Oh well

    • Wahots@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I even had Youtube premium for a bit. Revanced is nice just to dial back some of the bells and whistles that isn’t relevant to the video platform. The official app feels clunky.

      • Bob@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Id really like to use revanced while paying for premium if it means it doesn’t get borked every x months and I don’t risk getting banned, kind of like Spotify tolerates 3rd party clients as long as they are premium accounts

      • cole@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        yeah I use revanced + YT premium for sponsor block. Haven’t experienced any issues yet though

    • Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t mind the ads if they weren’t deliberately twice as loud as the music! That’s just fucking rude

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    We need better alternatives

    Also YT premium is not a good solution as it does nothing for privacy

    • underisk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Video is nearly impossible to host in a sustainable way. The bandwidth usage is among the most expensive things you can host. The only way you’re getting something better than YouTube is if it’s tax funded somehow.

      • Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Public libraries should host the peoples internet. As a service, not to generate tax dollars, not to break even.

        Jumping from platform to platform is just delaying the enshitification.

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Nebula is very sustainable.

        The 20mbit bandwidth of a 4k video might have been a lot 10 years ago, but it’s child’s play now.

        • falkerie71@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nebula works for now because it still has nowhere near the amount of videos being served and uploaded per minute than YouTube. Having to cache videos in servers all around the globe takes up significant cost too.

          • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That’s probably true, but economic sustainability is what makes privacy sustainability possible.

            Youtube is such a mess because it has to fight so hard to make ads work, which is unsustainable.

            Nebula makes its money through monthly fees and thus has no incentives to track users beyond providing a better service.

            Nebula being essentially a creators’ co-operative organization also helps with the sustainable governence side, too.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Also YT premium is not a good solution as it does nothing for privacy

      Neither is accessing any Google service in the first place, ReVanced or not.

        • woelkchen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Using third party clients does. Think invidious or piped with apps like Libretube

          It requires a proxy (Piped acts as proxy). A 3rd party client in itself doesm not because the video files are still streamed off Google servers.

            • woelkchen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Still good for privacy

              No, non-proxied clients don’t do shit for privacy. Accessing the video streams directly off Google servers is enough to be tracked,

              • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                But there isn’t any non-free code involved so all they have is your IP address at the time and what video you watched. That’s it.

                Not as great as a public proxy but it is way better than using the proprietary spyware

    • colonial@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      We need better alternatives

      We’d need a quantum leap in storage and bandwidth first - orders of magnitude better, if we want competing to be financially sane 😮‍💨

      Maybe when Google is (hopefully eventually) shattered into a million pieces by some US judge, YouTube could be splintered into several smaller companies, each with some portion of the infrastructure and channels/videos - thus forcing competition. Vaguely similar to the Bell divestiture.

  • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have YouTube Premium but I have to use ReVanced to block shorts because it’s terrible for my ADHD. My mental health has improved ever since I ripped that fucker out of my life.

    I want to control what I see, and this isn’t even about them being paid anymore, it’s just about forcing me to see what I don’t want to see.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good luck YouTube

    The official YouTube app will provide one of the better experiences…

    Ha ha ha ha… the author must be dreaming or hasn’t tried many other apps. NewPipe lets you run videos at custom speed, and optionally pitch-shift videos. And you can save videos to watch on any app capable of playing video files stored on disk.

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 months ago

    If they manage to break third-party applications, and they cannot be repaired, then I am totally just leaving YouTube entirely. It’s not worth it at that point.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I agree. I refuse to watch ads or to pay for an experience that offers less than a fraction of what Newpipe offers. When Newpipe is no longer viable I’ll repurpose that time to chipping away at my reading list.

  • KirbyProton@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 months ago

    I quit when they took away the dislike counter, so many said they would but didn’t. All I ever see about Youtube is people complaining about their new shitty tactics… just leave, it’'s the ONLY way to get any changes. They will never change if people keep using the platform.

    Suck it up, leave, you won’t regret it.

      • QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re not going to find everything you want outside of YouTube just yet. But apps like GrayJay make it a lot easier to start transitioning to other platforms.

        It combines most all of the video sharing platforms in one. From there you can start following creators if they have their channel setup on different platforms while still being able to keep your main home feed coming from YouTube if you wanted to.

    • lud@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      How did you quit? Is there any other video platform?

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Interesting, I guess we will have to see how quickly and widely this is enforced. I haven’t used the official YouTube app for a very long time and have relied heavily on third party alternatives (Vanced/ReVanced, NewPipe, LibreTube, Grayjay). There is absolutely no way I am paying $17 a month for YouTube so I think a family plan would probably be the best option, though at this point I think I’d be more likely to just abandon the platform altogether.

  • BaardFigur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Even if I paid for youtube premium, I wouldn’t get Sponsorblock or Return Youtube Dislike, so ReVanced is still the best user experience. I also block shorts, appearently that’s also ReVanced only

  • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    If my 3rd party app is broken to the point theh can’t bring it back, I would like to say I’d drop YouTube like a sack of moldy tangerines. But I really don’t know what I’d do without it. I use it about 8hrs a day.

  • MaXimus421@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    People really need to just stfu about a certain other app.

    If ya know, ya know. Otherwise stop advertising it you morons. Of course, it’s the internet and nobody can keep a secret but ffs why does every single gd post about YT have to be about ___ in the comment section.

    STFU about it!!

    When you mention YT and IMMEDIATELY bring THAT up publicly, you’re not helping anyone. Publicly shitting all over Google with it isn’t the brightest idea in the world. Good Lord, this is why we can’t have nice things…

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      People really need to just stfu about a certain other app. If ya know, ya know. Otherwise stop advertising it you morons…When you mention YT and IMMEDIATELY bring THAT up publicly, you’re not helping anyone.

      Do you really think that Google is only going to take down an app or adjust the API based on some comments, posts, articles?

      “Yo, Neal, did you see what that one person on Lemmy said? We gotta crack down on this API to fix that.”

      • MaXimus421@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Pal, any and every discussion about YouTube inevitably ends with it.

        I think eventually, banning of entire Google accounts isn’t out of the question. I didn’t believe this 5 yrs ago. Today, I think it’s quite possible. They have their 100 MILLION YTP subs.

        I seriously doubt banning the entirety of… non-conforming third party app users is something they would loose sleep over if it means stopping that in its tracks.

        I’m just spit balling here. But I still don’t see the pros of rubbing your thumb in their face with it, publicly.

        I know, API, Spoofing, Ect.

        I know. You’ve more faith in that than myself. To actually believe there isn’t anything they can do to go the extra mile and end it, seems extremely nieve imo. It’s just my opinion at the end of the day.

        Once you make a public mockery of them, and their name is synonymous with ___ then you’ll maybe get their full attention that we might not wish we’d receive in the end.

        • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I seriously doubt banning the entirety of… non-conforming third party app users is something they would loose sleep over if it means stopping that in its tracks.

          They would do it happily.

          I know, API, Spoofing, Ect. I know. You’ve more faith in that than myself. To actually believe there isn’t anything they can do to go the extra mile and end it, seems extremely nieve imo.

          You’re not quite getting what I’m saying. I think they absolutely would/will crack down on this, but they’re going to do that regardless of what we say here. I don’t think our comments are going to push them into doing it faster, and us not saying anything is going to make them go slower. With the resources/money/monitoring/tech/etc they have, they are well aware of all these tools before most users of them are. Us saying nothing is not keeping a secret, nor is it guiding their actions. You give our comments too much weight, and much more than they will, if they even think of us.

          • MaXimus421@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Oh I disagree wholeheartedly. It’s not “comments”. It’s entire discussions and detailed descriptions and directions on how to get it done.

            Any social media platform. Be it Reddit, Lemmy, Insta, Twitter ect.

            You mention YouTube and you’re getting a discussion about the alternative. And some asshat will inevitably explain it for others that aren’t hip to it.

            It’s point blank - in_your_face discussion about side stepping them. Over and over and over again every time YouTube is brought up. It’s not a “they aren’t worried about forum comments”

            EVERYONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT. ALL THE TIME. ALWAYS.

            This will eventually lead them to have no other choice but respond accordingly imo. Again, IMO.

            You say I give our comments and discussion too much weight.

            I hope you’re right. But poking a bear has no benefit. I’ll die on that hill.

            You wanna learn about ways to sidestep YT? There is an old term used by old school pirates of the high seas.

            You can find out more at “the usual places”.

            No need to have discussions about this publicly when you have literally NOTHING to gain and something to lose.

            Talk about it in the correct channels. Not in a fucking Reddit comment section. Why this method of security is worth clutching your pearls over is absolutely comical as if it’s difficult to comprehend.

            But go on, pretend your Superman and ____ is beyond any semblance of being squashed. GL with that, pal.

    • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you know about it, google knows too. They have an army of lawyers, they can easily find YouTube 3rd party clients.