• akrz@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    3 months ago

    Rowan Gavin Paton Menzies (14 August 1937 – 12 April 2020)[1][2][3] was a British submarine lieutenant-commander who authored books claiming that the Chinese sailed to America before Columbus. Historians have rejected Menzies’ theories and assertions[4][5][6][7][8]: 367–372  and have categorised his work as pseudohistory.[9][10][11]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gavin_Menzies

    • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      3 months ago

      The Haida and other native groups of coastal BC have no record of Zheng He’s voyage.

      And because his ships weren’t capable of handling the open ocean, the only way he’d be able to do such a trip is by hugging the coast, so they’d have absolutely seen them.

      • Microw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        3 months ago

        Mansa Muhammad’s travel is also considered to never have reached the Americas, if it even happened in the first place

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I’d never heard about this “Zheng He in America” thing before, so I just did a little reading about it. One thing I read said he supposedly sailed around Africa and to the east coast of America, which is even more implausible.

        • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          They did sail to Africa. They picked up giraffes and shit and brought them back to China. They intervened in local conflicts like “both of you lose! China wins! Give tribute.”

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            Sure, I’m not saying I doubted that part. The part that apparently doesn’t have real evidence and thus seems implausible is the notion that they continued all the way around the Cape of Good Hope and across the Atlantic.

          • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 months ago

            They didnt have to sail to Africa per say. By the time of those trips, there had been a reliable trade network for more than 1500 years stretching from Africa up through the Middle East into India.

            I don’t doubt that it’d be possible to harbour hop those boats down to Africa, but they only needed to go as far as India/Persia to connect.

  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    3 months ago

    Except Mali and China’s crossing is pure fiction and Polynesia’s is plausible but missing a lot of evidence you’d expect to find

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      Hasn’t it been proven that eastern polynesians have amerindian DNA, and also that their word for their crops of sweet potatoes is related to the Quechua word for similar crops still in south america?

      • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Yeah in 1200-1300 not 700AD, but there is some evidence of eariler voyages to South America and Antarctica

        Also the DNA is the other way around and also a coin flip as to whether it came from Madagascan slaves after the slave trade or from Polynesians hundreds of years earlier, and the sweet potato is also not hard evidence as it could be coincidence, and there is some evidence of it having spread earlier

        However oral history is quite strong in Polynesia and for whatever reason there’s no stories of large landmasses to the east, only icy ones to the south

        Essentially there’s no hard proof like there is with Leif Erikson and Columbus as it was at most a couple of accidental crossings which may not have even been return journeys, but there is a lot of evidence that suggests there was contact of some sort or another

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          IIRC the oral history could be explained, in that the folks on Rapa Nui were actually not the ones sailing to South America, it was actually the other way around.

          Were that the case then South America wouldn’t necessarily be documented in an oral history, just visitors from a far away land.

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    And the reason why Columbus managed to get funding for his journey was because he used incorrect estimations of the earth’s circumference, which indicated a much shorter distance to India than previous (much more accurate) estimations.

    • kbin_space_program@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Oddly enough it seems the same is true for Mansa’s trip. Except that as regent, he gave himself the funding, twice.

      However, as wikipedia notes: ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_voyage_of_the_predecessor_of_Mansa_Musa )

      1. No african artifacts have ever been discovered in South or Central America.
      2. Only one of the ships returned, and it only reported the existence of the “Canary Current” which that ship did not enter.

      In addition. The dark skin of some South Americans is genetically distant to modern Africans, but has ties to the same markers in some asian cultures, implying its addition was prehistoric and happened in the old world.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Not incorrect measurements of the earth’s circumference, rather he used incorrect maps that showed Asia as being like 4 times bigger than it actually is, with the Polynesian islands and Japan being a continent sized chain, each at minimum the size of Sardinia

      The reason people think he was using an incorrect circumference is because one of his journal entries can be read to either say he was close to mount purgatory, which would have been super far from where he’d have been, or that he believed he was heading in that direction, which to be fair he actually would have been had the mountain existed.

      I forget who but someone put it like this, if you asked Columbus for what continent he was on, he’d have been wrong, but if you asked for his coordinates on the earth’s surface, he’d have actually been pretty close to accurate.

      He knew “where” he was, he just didn’t know where that where was.

  • zout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Columbus was the first catholic to land in America. Guess who wrote our history books.

    • Liz@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bruh, it’s because Columbus kicked off the age of colonization that led to the modern world. All other claims to the first discovery are either the initial settlement or largely inconsequential meetings between worlds.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    No mention of the pharos getting blasted on drugs that are apparently only native to the americas?

    I think someone identified the substance in question on a couple of their tooth fragments