• KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    By the way, for editing server files consider nano. It’s also widely available, has simpler shortcuts and displays them on the screen. It’s obviously not powerful like vim, but a good match when you just need to edit a config file.

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nano is just as fiddly as vim and way less powerful when you actually figure out what you’re doing though?

      Ie a completely redundant piece of software that has no place being pre-installed anywhere

        • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          I just find the saving mechanism frustrating to use compared to vim’s as an entry level user, and now as a mid-skilled user I dislike how featureless nano is - when I was first learning how to use the terminal I hated having to edit anything as I was pretty much force-fed nano with no alternative provided, but on finding vim and remembering literally 3 things (:w, :q and i) everything became so much easier, but I definitely do have an extra bitter taste left about not being told about something much easier to use which irked me when I saw someone preaching how amazing nano is

          I also really don’t get the hate for vim when remembering 3 things gives you as much/more functionality as nano and is a starting point for so much more functionality - intuitive doesn’t mean featureless and don’t try and pretend nano’s shortcuts are the same as 99% of other editors (text or otherwise), in fact they’re totally different, making it less intuitive