• Ross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well this is a terrible shock in the pharmaceutical industry. Who would have thought?

  • Io Sapsai 🌱@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    1000$? It costs 80$ here. Insurance covers the 1mg injection completely. Drug prices on the US market are inflated as hell. Also it can be made for 5 bucks but the decades of research and billions poured into said research and testing is what raises the price.

    Regardless corporate greed is corporate greed and big pharma is into some really shady stuff. Especially when we get to biologicals.

    • The_v@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      In a research driven company, research is a basic operational cost. These are all sunk cost paid for by other products. Before the product is introduced all of the research has been paid for.

      So let’s take a look at this companies financials.

      https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/NVO/financials?guccounter=1

      Their cost of goods was 36 billion. Out of 232 billion in sales or around a 85% margin.

      It says they spent 32 billion dollars research.

      They claimed a profit of 104 billion dollars after spending 2x the total research bill on sales/marketing and admin (62 billion) in other research driven industries this would be around 1/2 research budget.

      They still made enough money to pay for more than 3 years of research.

      In better regulated industry where greed didn’t rule the day. They should be making less than 1/2 the gross income.

      This is pure greed based upon people’s suffering

        • The_v@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Nothing significant.

          There comes point where tossing more money at at a research topic does nothing. Certain stages in development just take time. There are bottlenecks in the development process that limit the speed.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    In other news the Danish government “discovered” an additional 16 billion DKK (2.13 billion EUR) in the budget, solely because of Novo Nordisk’s increased corporate taxes.

    I’m employed by the Danish government, and I’m getting a 6% raise on my next paycheck. Nurses and daycare workers are getting even more. Our military will actually be getting the NATO required 2% of the GDP. Meanwhile Americans are dieing because they can’t afford to buy the insulin… Feels dirty

    Can you imagine your national economy being so reliant on one company? If wegowy and ozempic turns out to cause pancreatic cancer then we’re fucked.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Denmark’s GDP is 400B USD, by comparison Texas is 2.3T USD. The difference that money makes for you isn’t nearly enough to improve shitty American lives to the same degree.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hollywood, OF and housewives hoarding all the medicine to look like Jack Skellington. Diabetics always getting fucked by corporate greed.

  • janNatan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’ve heard about shortages of the drug. Does anybody know how hard it actually is to make or if they’re manufacturing scarcity as well?

    • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Engineered Biologics involve having to make special cell cultures off engineered specimens so it’s a research forward cost. The actual production is cheap once the cultures are made.

      I think if you look deep enough you’ll find public funding in a lot of these projects like with Humira, which was funded by the UK Government and is now absurdly expensive as fuck

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s a pretty simple peptide, there’s multiple companies in China that make grey market versions.

      The scarcity seems to come from the government enforced monopoly, only a single company is officially allowed to make it and they don’t have enough machines, I imagine getting more machines takes time.

      Governments could issue compulsory licences for shortages like this, but they never do.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I personally know 3 people - who are not diabetic - who are on this drug to lose weight. It’s anecdotal evidence for sure, but it makes me think that people are seeing this as a miracle weight loss drug. Which is probably causing the shortages.

      • WamGams@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        The drug is definitely over prescribed I am sure, but surely using it as preventative treatment before the person becomes diabetic is long term better than waiting for them to become diabetic, right?

        I don’t really know anything about the drug but I know it has helped some people who really need it. It is a shame it is being locked behind patents and shortages.

  • atturaya
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    isn’t this the case with like every drug? why is this one special?