"There's every intent of a new movie coming out in the very near future"
  • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPMEnglish
    241·
    8 months ago

    “I am not able to say much, but I can say that it is Paramount’s intent to figure out the Star Trek side of movies and what’s going on there. There’s every intent of a new movie coming out in the very near future. There’s a lot of secrecy around what’s going to happen there. But there is a plan getting into place. And we’re very excited to see it return to the big screen.”

    Honestly, this seems more like a “plan to make a plan” to me.

  • Wooster@startrek.websiteEnglish
    6·
    8 months ago

    “There’s every intent of a new movie coming out in the very near future”

    I’m reading this to mean that the S31 movie is coming out sometime this summer. Between Discovery and Lower Decks. After October or so doesn’t sound ‘very neat future’ to me.

    I’m also not reading much into the ‘trying to figure out’ how to get the movies to the big screen. We know that S31 will be a P+ exclusive. Regardless of if it’s because of some preexisting contract with what was CBS All Access when the original project got green lit all those years ago or because S31’s lore leans too heavily on S1-3 Discovery to stand on its own, S31 was never going to be in major theaters.

    The purported Picard, Kelvin 4, or even the pitched Lower Decks movies? Those are probably going to actually be in theaters.

    • Value Subtracted@startrek.websiteOPMEnglish
      31·
      8 months ago

      In context, Roth states, “we’re very excited to see it return to the big screen.” That would seem to rule out that he’s referring to the S31 movie.

      I also think a summer release is highly unlikely for that, considering production only began at the end of January.

      • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
        82·
        8 months ago

        I really must agree! While an occasional cinematic outing can be enjoyable, Trek is at its best on the small screen!

        Edit: incidentally, for as much as I love the OT, I feel the same applies for the Star Wars franchise. Dave Filoni and John Favrau have done more with that franchise that Lucas ever could!

        • Michael Gemar@mstdn.ca
          3·
          8 months ago

          @gregorum I enjoy the excitement and spectacle of the original trilogy, but I agree that some of the SW TV shows have been excellent, and told stories that movies couldn’t.

          • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
            6·
            8 months ago

            Guilty pleasure: I really loved all of the boring political intrigue of the prequel trilogy and learning how the government of the Galactic Republic worked and how Palpy maneuvered into power and then overthrew the Republic and reorganized it into The Empire. I found all that boring shit fascinating, even as those films were, to their purpose, boring failures amd their stories told terribly. Because I’m a filthy neeeeeeerd.

            For the PT, I was more interested in the story than the plot, and then relied more on Close Wars for coverage of the era, for Anakin story/plot, and, of course, Ahsoka.

            • Michael Gemar@mstdn.ca
              5·
              8 months ago

              @gregorum I was actually ok with the political aspects of the prequels. I just thought that, personally speaking, the writing was pretty clunky and heavy-handed. I think Andor showed there’s plenty of room to do political intrigue in the Star Wars universe.

              • gregorum@lemm.eeEnglish
                5·
                8 months ago

                Yeah, the plot of the PT and the characters were just so dull and weird. Lucan can’t do dialogue.

                But Andor really shines with its political intrigue and that’s what I love so much about it. Seeing inside the ISB is awesome! that and how it tells such a deep, human story that’s as much about the characters as it is about the universe it’s in.

                See, that’s the thing about Andor that really stands out from even The Mandolorian (although there’s a good deal of it there): these don’t feel like characters a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away. Lucas wrote stories based on character archetypes from ancient mythology. Filoni and Favrau write characters and storylines based on allegory and metaphor for people here and now, today and in timeless social and political struggle and strife. They’re relatable, so their dramas, their struggles, their hopes and aspirations for freedom resonate with us on a much closer level. They become personal. We identify with them. And, as a result, we become personally invested in their journey and their fate.