We’ve all heard the liberal argument “if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you’re morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler.” But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
We’ve all heard the liberal argument “if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you’re morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler.” But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
I mean, it’s just dishonest. They don’t believe it themselves, it’s just a rhetorical tool. Liberals have only adopted that line of argument so they can shame anyone with principles into voting for Biden. If they did believe that 99% Hitler is worth supporting over 100% Hitler, why do they whine so much about Stalin?
Because they believe Stalin was worse than Hitler.
Then they should put their nuts on the table and admit they’re hitlerites.
Is that how you’re supposed to identify Nazis?
Oh, man, I’ve been going about this all wrong. Thanks!
They disagree on the fundamental principle that Biden is 99% Hitler.
Haven’t you seen /r/WhatBidenHasDone tankies?