• Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sanctions can also massively hamper a country’s economic development. It depends on the specifics of their domestic productive capacity and natural resources. For example, Venezuela’s economic hardships are primarily a result of sanctions combined with their underdeveloped domestic industry (colonial/neocolonial powers designated Venezuela a petrostate).

    When a country does have capacity and resources, though, sanctions on an industry are basically the same as a protectionist tariff: they stimulate the industry domestically. Imperialists usually try to create such situations for themselves and it’s great to watch them fuck up and do so on China’s behalf.

    • supafuzz [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Cuba is in a similar place as a sugar based economy, with fewer natural resources, and they managed to diversify to provide essential services in a way that Venezuela hasn’t. Venezuela seems to just be trying to get the oil magic back. “Skill issue” as the kids say but not every place is lucky enough to get a Castro

      • Maoo [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Cuba had the advantage of being run by an ML party and having consistent trading partners via the USSR et al for decades, focusing on building up industry. They are still very poor due to the sanctions, but do far better than their neighbors (like Haiti) because they can prioritize healthcare, food, community well-being, etc.

        Venezuela was never socialist, just had a SocDem party in power that tried to nationalize the oil industry, and were basically SOL when the sanctions regime hit. Chavez was actually trying to diversify, especially food production, but they had maybe 1 or 2 years to do so, tops.