The labels have the character’s name followed by 受 (uke), which means being the receptive or passive partner, or in BL slang means the bottom. Most underrated organizational system ever by the way. Please show this to anyone who claims that “unwoke” Japan doesn’t “shoehorn queerness into everything”.

  • Tankiedesantski [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I fully admit to being ignorant but in my mind being a guy and being attracted to dicks is somewhere on the spectrum of sexuality towards being gay or at least not “completely” hetero. Is the current definition self identification or something else I’m missing?

        • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It depends, like if I only like people with full on masculine features I’m a pretty standard gay man, if I only like people with feminine features I’m probably straight, and then it starts to break down in the middle, unless I don’t care about certain features, but there isn’t a hard line. Regardless of what specific person I am attracted to, I feel like if all I can think about is getting all up in a thick beard then I’m probably somewhere in the middle. I guess it’s all about the things that specifically are important to someone

          • ashinadash [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            “In the middle” shouts to the gender binary. I find it interesting that you acknowledge sexuality as being highly personal and deeply complicated, yet view it through a simple binary. Not that I broadly disagree with what you’ve said, fwiw

            • SerLava [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              I guess by in the middle I just mean not exclusively attracted to masculine or feminine attributes, speaking in terms of like more superficial physical attraction and not so much about romantic attraction and how that can be affected by gendered cultural norms and that sort of thing

              Sexuality definitely is hard to pin down, it’s like, all abstractions upon abstractions, it’s so complex really that identifying “objective” information about it is basically absurd- basically trying to describe a thought or emotion by listing out neuron states or something, it’s not possible

            • da_gay_pussy_eatah [she/her]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              I mean I get what you mean, my anatomy certainly doesn’t stop me from feeling like a woman. Obviously gender is far far more than anatomy, but I’m not going to pretend like they are completely unrelated. If that’s your experience, that’s great and I’m happy for you, but it’s unfortunately not mine.

              • ashinadash [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Why aren’t they completely unrelated? Because doctors assign everyone’s gender at birth exclusively based on their genitalia? Doesn’t sound that inherent to me.

                Especially given how surgeons frequently disfigure intersex infants to fit this binary.