• Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not sure you can have a solar powered blimp. It would rely on helium if hydrogen to float which would mean resupplying it on a regular basis as it will never be completely sealed and always have some slow gas losses over time.

      Unless you can somehow have a lightweight solar powered hydrogen producing machine which splits water taken from the air.

      • Nora@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s what first came to my mind. Water from air to hydrogen from water. Would need to do r&d tho to see if it’s possible.

          • Nora@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Is the energy from the sun that could be harvested from a blimp sized footprint enough to convert enough hydrogen to account for the leaks in a blimp and to power propellers to keep it in one spot.

            I don’t know those numbers.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I haven’t read about this, but I suspect this is going to be more useful for low population density areas. There is usually a connection cap that will be far too low for any kind of urban use. That’s okay, though. It’s usually easier and cheaper per user to have ground-based installations in an urban setting. This could be a great option to extend coverage in rural zones.

      • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Same for Starlink. There’s only so much bandwidth even a very modern antenna can have. And something flying is going to be power-limited as well.

      • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Same for Starlink. There’s only so much bandwidth even a very modern antenna can have. And something flying is going to be power-limited as well.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      It sounds like a Starlink satellite costs more than a million dollars, so that’s a pretty good deal if so. I wonder why this isn’t a thing already?

    • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It sounds like a Starlink satellite costs more than a million dollars, so that’s a pretty good deal if so. I wonder why this isn’t a thing already?

  • shortwavesurfer@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Something like this would be perfect. The higher in altitude you can get these things, the wider an area they can cover. However, that means more people will be on them. So there is a trade-off between square mileage of coverage and number of people connected.