• PoolloverNathan@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      It would make Threads unable to see content from instances defederating it and vice versa, preventing the Embrace step.

      • Corgana@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        That’s a common misconception actually, any and all data available via federation is already public and easily scrapable even without running an instance of one’s own. Defederating only hides (in this case) Threads content from users on the instance doing the defederating, but the data is still public. Not to mention copies of it would still be fully available on any extant federated instances.

        • Gestrid@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          But they would still be unable to embrace (and, by extension, extend and extinguish) because users from Threads would be unable to interact with users from other instances. Basically, they’d be unable to get rid of a potential competitor using the EEE method.

          • Corgana@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            But how could interoperability lead to extinguishing? That’s the part I don’t understand. By what means could Threads “extinguish” the network of instances that stay federated?

            • Bloops
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Here’s one way it could happen

              1. Facebook joins the Fediverse, becoming the largest instance
              2. Majority of Fediverse embraces this
              3. Facebook decides to deviate slightly from ActivityPub
              4. Not wanting to be disconnected, majority of Fediverse follows them
              5. The real, ActivityPub-based Fediverse is dead (or as small as it was when it started) and now Facebook controls its (former) instances
              • Corgana@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Step three is really making a lot of assumptions considering the entire reason Mastodon exists is to limit the control of big companies.

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      The same way we prevented any of that up ’till now: by doing our own thing on our own terms.