• GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    You’re getting dragged, but I think I get your point: that it might seed suspicion and distrust among not only the characters but the players?

    I think it should be Rule 0 that the DM and players all respect each other’s boundaries, so consent is always part of the equation IMHO. Likewise, if everyone at the table insists on playing a certain way that I’m uncomfortable with, then it’s time for me to find a new table.

    • Rubanski@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      The thing is, that it was, from my understanding, never about the actual players, but the fictional characters. Aka my high elf loves gambling a bit too much etc.

      • GoodbyeBlueMonday@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh agreed: I just thought the meta-nature of the players themselves being unsure of the veracity of character information might make things weird for folks uncomfortable with gossip. In any case I think it sounds like a fun idea!

    • luna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      No, it’s just trauma and not wanting that to come up at the game table. Simple as that. I had a group before the pandemic where just about everyone had some kind of trauma and this is 100000% not the kind of thing they or I would enjoy.