• MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    At the moment, e/OS and Graphene are two of the very few ROMs which pass SafetyNet OOTB.

    Once KernelSU becomes mainstream, every device will pass SafetyNet, till the time Google changes something drastically

    • FutileRecipe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      First GrapheneOS (and maybe e/OS? Not sure as I haven’t looked at them) is a fully featured OS and not a ROM. Second, it depends on the level of attestation, but GrapheneOS only passes MEETS_BASIC_INTEGRITY (again, not sure on e/OS).

      And Google already “changed something drastically” as SafetyNet is deprecated (replaced by PlayIntegrity).

      https://grapheneos.org/articles/attestation-compatibility-guide

      https://developer.android.com/google/play/integrity/migrate

      • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My apologies, I have no idea of the difference between a ROM and a mobile OS, since I use both interchangeably (colloquially speaking). Is this a GNU/Linux like affair?

        I didn’t know about play integrity. Is this new with Android 14? I’d be OK with not caring but most mobiles in the US don’t have custom ROM support any more. I’m waiting for KernelSU and custom patch support to grow so as to modify my mobile at all. I do not like where the industry is going. Even the FP5 was not released here (absolute shame)