• simple@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Dude was schizoposting the other thread and attacking everyone for downvoting him lmao

      • Atemu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why is it that GrapheneOS/CalyxOS always seem to attract these kinds of people?

        • logifad501@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          When you claim to make a “”“privoocy”“” os and proceed to shill for google you inevitabily reveal the fact that you’re a honeypot.

    • The Hobbyist@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure you’re attempting good faith communication, but in the case you are, I think most people’s opinion is that there could be room for Google but people are just concerned about Google being the only option instead of one of many. That’s also my interpretation for GrapheneOS’s stance, they don’t intend on breaking compatibility with Google services but instead run them on your own terms, putting the user in control of how Google operates on their phone. Hence, I don’t see any contradiction in your two statements.