- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- security@lemmy.ml
- security@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- privacy@lemmy.ml
- security@lemmy.ml
- security@lemmy.ml
You must log in or register to comment.
So this persons picked out two projects (one of which is known since long time to be not up to cryptographic standards) and makes it a “all GNU is bad” article? Is this person even aware that GNU is just an umbrella organization with primarily non cryptographic projects? Idk, but even if the technical criticism is valid (which I can’t verify) this seems dishonest :(