• alvvayson@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Really curious to see the outcome.

    Most research up until now seems to point to this as the best way to solve poverty.

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not only that, but it likely significantly stimulates the local economy. People with no money buy nothing, meanwhile people with an excess of money don’t buy much extra.

      • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m worried about companies just raising their prices to absorb the extra money like they did with the covid stimulus.

        • Franklin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This has been a common argument made against raising minimum wage.

          There is some truth to it, companies absolutely do try to profiteer however in Canada and many states that have raised their minimum wage the quality of life of the average person did increase despite these effects.

          Moreover every test of universal basic income not only increased the quality of life of the people but tax revenue as well because it gave citizens the economic mobility to seek more gainful employment and education.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, in a healthy developed economy inflation is a sign of more economic activity. When people have money, they spend it (duh). This balance between low employment and low inflation is what the Federal Reserve tries to achieve through managing interest rates.

            Worrying about a little inflation is missing the forest for the trees. It’s more important that quality of life improves and the economy does better.

            • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not worried about a little healthy inflation, I’m terrified about the 10+% annual inflation we’ve seen the last few of years continuing or worsening. People are watching their income and savings being gobbled up by ridiculous prices, and it hurts. I wasn’t trying to state that giving people money would for sure cause additional price increases or even argue against giving the money. I was more or less just expressing concerns over a possible outcome. Since it is indeed a possible outcome, hopefully anyone passing any legislation around a UBI also considers it and either passes accompanying legislation to address the risk, or gives education on money management and supply/demand principles so that everyone doesn’t just rush out and throw all their new money at companies, prices be damned.

              • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Studies show that people don’t “throw all their new money” at stupid things when they get a small amount of money. They fix their car or buy their kid new shoes, things they needed but couldn’t afford.

                Inflation was never near 10%, let alone above it. I think you need to do a bit more research on these topics.

                • SokathHisEyesOpen@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Official federal inflation over the last 3 years has been between 6-7%. That’s not indicative of local inflation, nor does it account for hyper inflation on specific goods like groceries. I have watched the prices on certain grocery items increase up to 100% in the last couple of years. I’ve watched some discretionary goods increase between 30-50%. My rent has been increased 22% in the last two years. So the fed not reporting 10% inflation for the year doesn’t necessarily mean that people’s purchasing power hasn’t been reduced by a greater margin.

                  Studies show that people living below their means will spend additional income on necessities, bills they’re behind on, etc. That’s fucking fantastic! But we’ve also seen that people who are current on bills and not in poverty will spend windfall money on luxury goods or entertainment. That’s also good because it stimulates the economy. People who are well off will just save or invest windfalls.

                  Again, I’m not trying to argue against UBI. I’m just expressing concerns over how the extra capital will influence pricing, if at all.

      • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My only worry about unintended consequences is that if this becomes a broader program (say, everybody gets $1000/mo, not just families that meet aome.kind of criteria), then prices for basic goods like rents will go up (i could see rents going up exactly $1000). Otherwise who could argue how well this kind of cash supplement works?

        • Bonehead@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          1 year ago

          They gave the exact same reason for why they didn’t want to raise minimum wage, and then rents went up anyways. I don’t buy it…

        • KepBen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          Imagine a system where prices didn’t magically skyrocket every time the poor catch a break

        • TWeaK@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah that is a concern, however it’s one that people studying these systems are well aware of and looking to account for.

        • ashok36@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It depends on the good or service in question. Price elasticity is a pretty well studied field.

    • chuckleslord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s my prediction. Poverty crushed, nothing but positives come from the experiment, and then nothing comes from it because “puritan work ethic”.

    • Landsharkgun@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Germany has been doing 500/month per child for the whole country for years now, so we kinda already know it will turn out fine.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a bad idea. I can’t wait until inflation makes literally everything super expensive