Australian national broadcaster ABC has projected three states voted No, effectively defeating the referendum.

    • geolaw
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes the proposed change to the constitution lacked detail, but that is entirely in keeping with the constitution as a whole, it is a “high-level” document after all. The detail would have come in the legislation that enacted it, with plenty of public consultation and discussion in parliament, no different to any other legislation. In its final form it would have probably looked a lot like previous advisory bodies that we used to have, with the critical difference being that it could not be disbanded just because the government of the day didn’t like it.

    • pezhore@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not familiar with the Australian political terms, can you share what this means:

      inner dialogue between their mobs and local governments

      To me, that sounds like the Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islanders are free to think about what they want, and then form a potentially violent, roughly organized group of people to confront local officials… But I assume I’m missing something.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        From google: ‘Mob’ is a term identifying a group of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people associated with a particular place or Country. ‘Mob’ is an important term for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, as it is used to describe who they are and where they are from.

      • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Australian slang a mob can just mean any grouping of people, not necessarily a criminal group or a group of rioters. It’s not uncommon for people to refer to their own ethnic or political grouping as a mob; at least from what I’ve seen when reading Australian websites.

        And by local government I think they are referring to the states and territories governments.

        • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This is correct, mob in this context is a number of indigenous people belong to one particular community. There are various different mobs out there which is one of the reasons why a singular controlled voice was never going to work.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah as someone outside Australia I’ve been surprised at how biased and simplified the reporting has been. A complex constitutional issue is being painted as a simple “good people, bad people”.

      When I read about the changes myself (after having to go hunting for some actual detail - the reporting is pretty poor on this) it honestly seems more like virtue signalling rather than useful or meaningful reform.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Its the eternal false dichotomy of “one side of a dispute must be the good guys, meaning the other side are therefore the bad guys.”

        • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Last time I looked at the count 40% of indigenous people voted against the voice, there’s definitely no good/bad side in this regardless how some might choose to vilify others. We have compulsory voting as well.

        • Welt@lazysoci.al
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The result has produced a lot of sore losers. The campaign involved a lot of just straight up losers.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Relevant: the Black Peoples Union position on the referendum (interview on ABC).

      An aggregation of written statements collected from socialist, anarchist and radical Indigenous groups, showing the diversity of thought on the matter: http://old.reddit.com/r/AustralianSocialism/comments/161r8r1/megathread_of_leftist_statements_on_the_voice/

      (PS: don’t just take all the ‘yes’ and ‘no’ summaries in that list at face value, a couple of them are misinterpretations or oversimplications)

    • Welt@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unlike America, you at least don’t have to “love it or leave it”! We still have it pretty good, globally speaking.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t see how. We’ve already officially said sorry as a nation and have strong native title rights and laws were indigionous people can claim their ancestral lands, own them and live on them as traditional as they would like to.

      Indigenous communities are still alive and well in many parts of Australia and can freely make the choice to assimilate with western culture or not. Australia is a huge and sparsely populated place that does not force this on indigionous people at all.

      At some point the indigenous community needs to stop considering themselves victims and focus on the future of their people and culture. What is generally amusing is that it tends to be inner city privileged indigenous people who tend to make the most noise about this.