Also weird that the article title says ‘for trans’ instead of ‘for being transgender’

  • CA0311 [they/them]@hexbear.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    i don’t know anything about this source but it’s kind of bitterly amusing that this article has a bunch of pictures of her from different angles, like they know full well that many hogs in their audience are going to want to analyze her appearance and decide for themselves if she “looks trans”