• Nurgle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    The number is massive regardless, but this figure is speculation fyi

    The Justice Department’s lead litigator Kenneth Dintzer, estimates Google’s ISA payments to be over $10 billion, and while the true figure remains confidential, the $18-$20 billion estimate assumes a new magnitude.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    According to a Bernstein analyst, that’s how much Google is paying Apple to keep its top spot, representing roughly 15% of the iPhone maker’s annual operating profits.

    Bernstein analysts are looking into Apple’s exposure to the Department of Justice’s antitrust lawsuit against Google, originally reported by The Register.

    One of the major interest areas of the case is the payments it makes to Apple, classified under the Information Services Agreement (ISA).

    “We believe there is a possibility that federal courts [will] rule against Google and force it to terminate its search deal with Apple,” says the Bernstein report.

    Google’s Chief Executive Officer Sundar Pichai raised concerns over the bad optics of its Safari deal back in 2007.

    “I don’t think it is a good user experience nor the optics is great for us to be the only provider in the browser,” said Pichai in emails to co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin that were revealed in the case.


    The original article contains 304 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 48%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s not clear to me how browsers are supposed to make the list of search engines open and not bound to money. Especially for closed source stuff, how would it work? Should they have a git repo to which search engines can make pull requests to to be included in the list of search engines a user can choose from when first starting up Safari?

    If the list and process of getting on the list is closed, then one can always just assume that to get on the list, it requires money. But if that’s made illegal… yeah, not sure how this should be solved.

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    As long as they don’t suddenly stop supporting Apple devices overnight, leaving Apple to scramble to make their own search engine that sucks and still sucks 10 years later. #mapgate

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      There was a recent post about them entertaining making DuckDuckGo the default. I think it’s just a negotiation point.

        • ripcord@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          It was ok to me, but still tended to find the Google results better (especially in verbatim mode) and kept going back to it.

          I’m using Kagi right now for a bunch of reasons and it’s awesome, but 99.99% of people aren’t going to pay money for a search engine. Especially at these prices. But it’s way less money than Google, and Bing make off mining our data, or DDG does selling ads and doing SOME mining

      • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        They’re getting better but still takes you to the the back entrance of the place now and then. Plus it doesn’t take me to the shortest drive on my commute. Keeps on taking me to local streets, adding 5 minutes then I disregard the turn and it updates for a shorter drive. But they’re making progress.