Some of the many articles about it:

The notion that wolves fight amongst each other and the strongest becomes the “alpha” and the weakest is the “omega” and all that, is a misconception that has been debunked ages ago, and even the author of the study who called them “alphas” in the first place is pleading with his old publisher to stop printing the dang book already so this misconception can finally die out.

Wolf packs are more or less just families. One “breeding pair” and their pups, which often stay with their parents way into adulthood.

  • Wolf Link 🐺@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Exactly this. Put any one species into a tiny depressing enclosure with way too many strangers and way too little food, and they will fight and establish a pecking order eventually. This has nothing to do with how the same species would behave in the wild and with enough resources to live comfortably, and the author realized that mistake years ago and is since trying to correct it.

    But I guess the entire “alpha male” thing is just too popular with certain people … ahem.

    • Synnr@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I chuckle inside and exit the room at the first chance when someone non-jokingly refers to themselves as an alpha male. And that’s not because I’m afraid of them–the fact is that I’m the alpha male.

      /s

      Humans in packed cities could be described in a similar way though, if there’s not a social reinforcement in place, by the community elders who are respected and followed, to keep them from it. I live in a medium sized city now because of work, but even still I can relate to the rats [I’m aware of the studies flaws].

      Put any one species into a [packed] depressing [space] with way too many strangers and way too [varied amounts of resources per individual], and they will fight and establish a pecking order eventually. This has nothing to do with how the same species would behave in the wild and with enough resources to live comfortably.

      I grew up in the country with tens of acres and my nearest neighbor was a mile away. Separated from the small town nearby by a river and surrounded by thick hedgerows going miles around in every direction, with a huge open space (fields) between our house and the hedgerows. I’ve never been happy in the city. No matter where I am, I feel like I’m in a cage. I’m not agoraphobic but there’s a sense of being ‘watched’ when I leave my house that just isn’t there when you live in a remote area. All the people, sights, sounds, smells can be incredibly overwhelming at times.

      I am only capable of attaining a true level of peace when I’m in nature.

    • PixxlMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Whether or not it’s a real concept doesn’t matter to these people, all that matters is whether it appeals to their pre conceived notions or not.

    • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      Also a great argument for the fact that caging humans doesn’t change anything in a positive direction. Especially when you enslave them too like in countries with barbaric penal systems such as the US.

    • mycatiskai@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Funny that pecking order is something you see in chickens. So these human alpha males are copying hen behavior.