Net neutrality’s court fate depends on whether broadband is “telecommunications”::We dig deep into how Supreme Court’s “major questions doctrine” could affect FCC.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nope, it’s definitely not telecommunications. I consider it more of a soft cheese, heavy in dairy.

    What in the absolute fuck would it be other than telecommunications?

  • redders@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like anyone using third party DNS has a telecommunications provider.

    Anyone using ISP DNS has an information service provider…

  • ItsMeForRealNow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It 100% is. All the technology used is essentially the same as ones used for telephonic telecommunications. Including the electromagnetic spectrum - visible light in fiber optic cables in a pineapple under the sea.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    With the Federal Communications Commission preparing to reimpose net neutrality rules and common-carrier regulation on Internet service providers, the broadband industry is almost certain to sue the FCC once the decision is made.

    Federal appeals courts upheld previous FCC decisions on whether to apply common carrier rules to broadband, a fact that current agency officials point to in their plan to revive Obama-era regulation of ISPs under Title II.

    But some legal commentators claim the FCC is doomed to fail this time because of the Supreme Court’s evolving approach on whether federal agencies can decide “major questions” without explicit instructions from Congress.

    It would be folly for the Commission and Congress to assume otherwise," two former Obama administration solicitors general, Donald Verrilli, Jr. and Ian Heath Gershengorn, argued in a white paper last month.

    The certainty expressed by Verrilli and Gershengorn is less surprising when you consider that their white paper was funded by USTelecom and NCTA–The Internet & Television Association, two broadband industry trade groups that sued the Obama-era FCC in a failed attempt to overturn the net neutrality rules.

    The FCC’s Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), which is pending a commission vote, will seek public comment on how the major questions doctrine might affect Title II regulation and net neutrality rules that would prohibit blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization.


    The original article contains 795 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 72%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Ddhuud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Am I in the same room as all of you guys? Speak up, who of you ate the last Oreo?