Didn’t know where to post this, so hopefully this is the right spot. Please boycott Brave. I’ve recently learned that not only is their CEO bad, but their fanbase is toxic, too. I will no longer be using Brave for that reason.

  • verassol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    What’s the problem with emotions though? Do you believe emotion can be easily separated from most statements? Isn’t one of the main problems with tech in our times that it’s manipulating emotions? A sense of invasion that prompts a need for privacy does not involve emotion? A sense of justice for user freedom does not involve emotion? Emotions are pervasive and subtle, this trend of preferring the emotionless option over the one that shows emotion weirds me. Someone who feels targeted by a homophobe feeling ‘emotional’ about it seems more than valid to me, and calling it emotional in a dismissive way is like saying that emotion is not valid/important.

    • Nevar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      The problems is that your emotions are different than my emotions so we try as a society to separate emotions when making decisions that affect everyone. It’s actually part of the basis of the scientific method.

      • verassol@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 years ago

        That would be true if such “society” was ruled according to the scientific method. I agree with your premise, what I’m trying to point out is that those who actually make the calls can and will often act on emotions, and use the emotions of the population against it. They have no regard for our emotions being different. It’ s not “we” who try to separate emotions, it’s those we are in power of making that separation, and they separate not according to the scientific method but according to socio-economical interest.

        • ree@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Or you can see it differently.

          Scientific methods showed that appealing to the general instead of the particular is more widely accepted as argument in our societies.

          Eg : boltanski & thevenot “de la justification”

          • verassol@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            What are “our” societies? I live in one dominated by fundamentalist Christians.

            • ree@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 years ago

              Well I’m Belgian and the book in refer to is about France.

              I’m sure it can be generalised. But I don’t have any references.