In politics most people just critizise each other, but what did your local government actually do a good job on?

  • twelvefloatinghands@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Permanently. And “quit” seems like too light a word for the herculean task of getting clean. They deserve all the help we can give. That it essentially removes all the negative externalities should make this a no-brainer.

    • cricket97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      giving drugs to a drug addict is not helping them, sorry. and giving them money doesn’t remove all negative externalities, that is a ridiculous statement. It just makes them less desperate for cash, they are still in a full blown addiction being controlled by the drugs.

        • cricket97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Why don’t you give them your money? Go minimize harm in your local community.

          Addicts quit because they hit rock bottom. They get to a point where they cannot sustain their lifestyle. You will be preventing them from ever getting to that point and they will be able to sustain their addiction indefinitely. Until the money runs out and they are more addicted than when they started. Free money never lasts forever.

      • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Perhaps it would be better if you didn’t spoke about things you understand shit about

        • cricket97@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Good comment bro. Bet you felt smart writing that. Go give all your money to drug addicts bro its what the science says is best