Why are they doing this when he’s at his Hitler stage 🤦‍♂️

    • CriticalOtaku [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The author’s intended messages: “fascism bad because an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” and “only petulant manchildren would perpetuate genocide because at the end of the day they’re scared little children afraid of losing their mother figures”

      The message chuds take away because the author is an idiot who spends far too long making genocide “epic and “cool”: “Genocide kinda based actually”

      You’re right, of course. AoT ends up a fascist text.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The author’s intended messages: “fascism bad because an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” and “only petulant manchildren would perpetuate genocide because at the end of the day they’re scared little children afraid of losing their mother figures”

        The message chuds take away because the author is an idiot who spends far too long making genocide “epic and “cool”: “Genocide kinda based actually”

        walter-breakdown

        The message people that consume the product that don’t want to feel bad when it gets criticized: “this product can’t be bad and can’t be primarily a fascist text, intentional or not, because I was entertained by it. Everything that entertains me must be good because I am good.” morshupls

        • CriticalOtaku [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Everything that entertains me must be good because I am good

          The Author is dead. The Author remains dead. And we have killed him. […] Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become authors simply to appear worthy of it?

          • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s a paradox among especially treatbrained people where they insist that things must happen how they happened in the fiction because of what the fiction says and it could not have happened any other way (the Thermian argument) but also insist in “death of the author” mantras to the dismiss author’s stated intent when it’s inconvenient to their treat gobbling.

            • CriticalOtaku [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Schrödinger’s Author.

              Tho ppl who invoke the Thermian argument are usually more concerned with ‘lore’ and mystery boxes rather than any sort of critical reading, it’s all just content to them.

              • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Some of them just want “historically accurate (in its own fiction)” excuses for why Zelda must always be the damsel in distress and Link must always rescue her from brown-coded recurring bad man.

    • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fascists are already quick to cherry-pick things that excite them in any given fiction, so any story that tries to justify a genocide is deliberately feeding fascists at this point.