Apple considered ditching Google for DuckDuckGo in Safari’s private mode | But Apple exec argued DuckDuckGo wasn’t as private as believed.::But Apple exec argued DuckDuckGo wasn’t as private as believed.

  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m not as great as an Apple Exec, but I think he’s wrong.

    • Fuzzypyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      1 year ago

      But he’s actually right. It does serve ads and it uses bing trackers despite them claiming they don’t track you.

      • Gazumi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Relative vs absolute concern here. Google is absolutely terrible, just in the past 24 hours we’ve learned more of their insidious methods. DDG is relatively saintly, compared to most other public search engines

      • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also DDG is US based and has to submit to all the privacy invading American agencies. And they could be under a gag order nobody would ever know.

        If privacy was a genuine concern for DDG they would have never based their business in the US.

        • Not_mikey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Where should it be based then? I feel like you can’t trust any state to not do this sort of thing to fight “terrorism” and “crime”

          • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I would say Switzerland.

            They have great privacy laws and a culture of secrecy from their banking history.

            They definitely would have an NSA equivalent but with far less reach I would think. They are a “neutral country” as I see it so they don’t need such a strong foreign spy agency…

            At the very least, the US would be one of worse choice possible for privacy that’s for sure.

            Keep in mind that the spying done by the NSA was fully legal there. They had this whole framework of laws to justify and authorize it.

            I mean the NSA intercepting CISCO routers to bug them ?

            That’s a bold move that most countries couldn’t do…

            https://www.infoworld.com/article/2608141/snowden--the-nsa-planted-backdoors-in-cisco-products.html

        • DTFpanda@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          And they could be under a gag order nobody would ever know.

          This sounds a little tinfoil-hat-y but I don’t really know what I’m talking about.

          • Tetsuo@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            It was done in the past for larger US based businesses. I don’t see why it couldn’t be done with DDG.

            Also, if your businesses is under a gag order the most logical thing to do is to act like nothing is happening. Because for DDG privacy IS the product. They don’t have better results than Google they are trying to differentiate through privacy (or the appearance of privacy).