• demonsword@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    But even rolling from there, a 300% hike in base prices would mean games cost $200, and that’s just not true.

    if you consider that nowadays (almost) all games ship incomplete and demand DLCs… yeah, it’s true

    • ampersandrew@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      That wouldn’t be the base price; the base price is $70 for the biggest games. I think people are also a bit liberal with labeling games as “incomplete”, when really they mean, “this game will have DLC after the fact because it’s the best way to make games that take years to make without laying people off”. And just to take a brief look along some games in my library, Cyberpunk 2077 would cost a maximum of $100 with DLC, by the time Guilty Gear Strive is sunset (if it runs for 5 years) it will still be shy of $200 in a worst case, and I’m seeing far more games without DLC than with DLC.

      • demonsword@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        DLCs aren’t the only “evil”, there’s also the case for microtransactions and other stupid monetization bullshit schemes

        • ampersandrew@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          So don’t play those games. The only way that’s “almost all games” is if you’re looking at the mobile market. Once again, still not included in the base price.