• teolan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unlike every other company in their position they’re not complete assholes to consumers :

    • steam deck not locked down at all and reparable
    • steam and valve games support Linux very well
    • they don’t sign exclusivity deals for games to only be on steam

    Most companies in their position would lock their users in, they don’t. That doesn’t mean they can’t be abusive though. 30% of game revenue is huge!

    • Tau@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      At least gamedevs can generate keys and sell them on other sites to get a bigger cut

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t think you can do that on EGS or GOG. So they ask 30%, but only if they actually helped make the sale. If you drove the revenue yourself, they’re happy to distribute the game for free on their platform.

        That’s about the least scumbag model I can think of.

        • Tau@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, but his way you get the advantages of having it on Steam while bypassing the 30% cut of Valve.

          My point was that, while Valve does take a big cut, it doesn’t stop gamedevs from bypassing it