Would there be a reason to cast a higher level version of a spell if there is no difference between it and it’s lower level version?

For instance:

Speak With Animals II seems to be the same as Speak With Animals I. There are other examples with other spells, but is there a reason to cast the different versions? Cost seems the same, effect seems the same…

  • ono@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Yes: If you’re out of spell slots at the base level, but have higher level spell slots remaining.

    It’s also possible that upcasting makes your spell more resistant to an enemy’s Counterspell, depending on how Larian implemented the mechanics. I believe this would follow 5e RAW, but I haven’t tested it in this game.

    Edit: Rephrased for clarity.

    • pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, upcasted Counterspell is functioning in game. If you really want to stop a spell cast with the highest spell slot.

      • ono@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        I’m not talking about upcasting Counterspell, but upcasting some other spell to make it less likely for a Counterspell against it to succeed.

        • pyrflie@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Both directions work since the mechanics of Counterspell function based on the spell slot used to cast. Same or better spell slot autocounters; everything else is a spell attack roll against 10 + the spell slot of the the cast spell.

          Edit: I probably shouldn’t have use spell attack to describe it but it’s basically the same minus the equipment and ability bonuses that apply to attack rolls specifically.

    • s12@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I thought RAW couunterspell ignores if a spell has been upcasted. I remember something about it only taking the original spell level.

      • ono@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        The Player’s Handbook says this:

        When a spellcaster casts a spell using a slot that is of a higher level than the spell, the spell assumes the higher level for that casting.

        Counterspell’s description says nothing to override this.

  • AdmiralAckbar@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Some scale and some don’t. At least on the PC version it tells you if there is any benefit to casting with a higher spell slot.

  • pyrflie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Shield is the best and most common answer to this situation as it only ever adds 5 to AC, but if that 5 AC is the difference between your character going down then it’s worth a 2nd or even 3rd lvl slot for an additional cast.

  • fqdnDOTcom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    No, if there’s no stated difference for upcasting then there’s no reason to do so