The actor told an audience in London that AI was a “burning issue” for actors.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you made a painting for me, and then I started making copies of it without your permission and selling them off, while I might not have stolen the physical painting, I have stolen your art.

    Just because they didn’t rip his larynx out of his throat, doesn’t mean you can’t steal someone’s voice.

    • ThenThreeMore@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We’re getting into samantics but it’s counterfeit not stolen.

      It would be more like if you made a painting for me, and I then used that to replicate your artistic style and used that to make new paintings without your permission and passed it off as your work.

    • drekly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I just printed a picture of the Mona Lisa.

      Did I steal the Mona Lisa? Or did I just copy it? Reproduce it?

      • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re also not causing da Vinci to potentially miss out on jobs by copying it. You’re also not taking away his ability to say no to something he doesn’t want to be associated with.

        • drekly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s fine. I’m not arguing this is a bad thing, I’m just being pedantic about the word theft.

          Having your voice used to say things you didn’t say is a terrifying prospect. Combined with deep faking takes it one step further.

          But is it technically theft?