Why bother even having kickoffs if every kick is just going to sail out the endzone with no possibility of a return, or trying to pin the opposition deep? It was bad week 1, and bad again here in week 2.

Just start out from the 25 and be done with kickoffs/returns entirely, instead of this farce. “Stopgap” excuse be damned.

  • kilodelta @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would be weird to eliminate a large part of the football game that requires a foot and a ball.

    • wjrii@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hypothetically, you could really get rid of all of it. Kickoffs could be 4th and 25 to allow for something like onside kicks. Combine that with a rule that incompletions on 4th down are turnovers at the spot where the ball hits the ground to replace punts and normal kickoffs. Finally, do offseason testing to see what size and configuration of “uprights” (some sort of single Quidditch hoop?) results in quarterbacks roughly matching kickers’ percentages on PATs and FGs.

      It would strike us all as being goony AF, but when you get down to it, the kicking specialists are kind of relics anyway, and at this point they mostly serve to add randomness and drama by leveraging “black box” skillsets that none of their teammates possess. It’s like, “you as an offense only managed to reach the ‘X’ yardline so you have only earned a ‘Y%’ chance at ‘Z’ yards of field position or 3 points.” Kicking and punting are already like a weird minigame, and they could be replaced by one focused on throwing without fundamentally altering the nature of the sport.

        • wjrii@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Field position is football.

          No doubt. I’m just saying the specific biomechanical skillset to manipulate it is very different from the rest of the game and is how it is mostly as a legacy thing. It would be a bit more extreme, but not a world apart from the camp in the soccer world that would like to do away with throw-ins.

            • wjrii@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Okay, LOL, fair enough. It’s a fun thought experiment, but while I wouldn’t be as upset as most I’m honestly not particularly invested in my own ideas here.

              Could be interesting for an alt- or minor league that wanted a gimmick and to put their quarterbacks even more front and center.