Summary

  • Researchers at the University of Wisconsin–Madison have demonstrated that Chrome browser extensions can steal passwords from text input fields, even if the extension is compliant with Chrome’s latest security and privacy standard, Manifest V3.

  • They created a proof-of-concept browser extension that could steal passwords and put it through the Chrome Web Store review process.

  • The attack works by exploiting the fact that extensions have full and unfettered access to the Document Object Model (DOM) of every web page you visit. The DOM is a representation of a web page in computer memory that can be accessed and changed, allowing the page to be modified on-the-fly.

  • The researchers found that most of the top 10,000 websites are vulnerable to this attack, including Google, Facebook, Gmail, Cloudflare, and Amazon.

  • They also analyzed the extensions already on the Chrome Web Store and found that 12.5% of them had the necessary permissions to exploit the password input field vulnerabilities.

  • The researchers offer two potential fixes: A “bolt on” remedy for vulnerable sites and a “built in” remedy for browsers.

  • The bolt on is a JavaScript library that can be added to websites to prevent unwanted access to password fields.

  • The built in remedy suggests changing Chrome to alert users whenever any JavaScript function accesses any password fields.

Possible Takeaways / Other Details

  • Google have improved security in the Manifest V3 standard, but it’s still possible to sneak in a password stealing extension into the webstore.

  • Some/all of the standard’s security improvements may have also been adopted by Microsoft Edge, and Mozilla Firefox.

  • It is important to be aware of the risks associated with using browsers’ extensions. Only install extensions from trusted sources and carefully review the permissions that they request.

  • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The problem then becomes that extensions are still in control of everything else on the website: A malicious extension could simply hide or move the input field away and then create a new one in its place.

    Personally, I don’t see how one could make extensions secure without severely crippling their functionality or turning it into a game of cat and mouse.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If an extension is blocked by the browser from accessing the value of any input field, text node content and recording keystrokes how can it then manipulate pages in a way that grants access to passwords?

      The extension designer would have to actually create functionality which plausibly needs those permissions granted. Which would put a big dent in the “hello, if you want to monetize your extension put this code in it” type of scammers trying to gain access to that information via an extension that helps you zoom into images or whatever

      • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Then they could recreate their own input field by recreating their own “totally-not-an-input-field” with a canvas element and a bit of JS. Or, if that also gets blocked, just straight up redirect the user to a phishing site by replacing the login button or some other means. Plenty of people probably wouldn’t notice in time.

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a whole lot of effort compared to how they are able to phish now, which is launder their code by paying some (perhaps unsuspecting) extension developer to include an external dependency in their well-established extension.

          Such effort as you’re describing would be harder to pull off, easier to spot and limit the victim pool significantly all at the same time.

          • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The methods they described are very common hacking techniques once a site is compromised. They are not difficult nor more work than you’d expect, not out of the realm of normal work for a hacker with a site they can tweak.