• HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can probably translate, given the context

      It’s “evil/leftist/PC/woke/liberal/sanitised” thoughts, written or spoken, that’s sarcastically called right speech as a way to mock and bemoan the fact that using slurs, punching down, and harassment (particularly towards genuinely marginalised people) etc, is becoming ever the less tolerated by a majority of humans.

      • dope@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        According to the votes my post constitutes “wrong speech”.

        How would you classify it. Slur? Harassment?

          • dope@lemm.eeOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks man. You are a true asset to the conversation.

    • dope@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Speech that we like. You can tell by the votes.

  • Firefly7@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    If this question is “Would you rather everyone be able to talk, or just people who are correct?” Then, uhm, correct according to who?

    I prefer having a range of forums of different functions, from “Only my friends can speak” to “everyone, save for those who use speech to harass or intimidate, can speak” to “only the teacher can speak.” None of those fit neatly into either category here (even teachers are sometimes wrong).

  • alokir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It depends.

    Should governments regulate what you can or have to say? No (except if you threaten someone, call for physical violence etc.)

    Should individual people have the ability to ban you from their property or web service because of what you say? Yes (I prefer if they don’t but it should still be their right to do so)

    Should businesses? Yes but probably not arbitrarily

    What about spaces that can be seen as public forums? It’s complicated, maybe it should be handled on a case by case basis

    • dope@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      But how about you? Which one do you, personally, prefer?

      You have the power of the vote after all. The choice is entirely yours.

      • alokir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really understand your question. Like I wrote in my comment, I prefer to handle it depending on context.

  • Basilisk@mtgzone.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Free* speech.

    *With purchase of speech of greater or equal value, at participating locations, some terms and conditions apply. Offer void where prohibited. No cash substitutions allowed.

    • dope@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Speech that is popularly approved of basically. Or authoritatively approved of maybe, if you have one of those.

      Votes are a good judge of that. Look at the votes on my post.