• Vorpal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Seems rather limited: only targeting some high level languages. Now, if this could also generate C++ bindings i would be very interested.

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hmm, but Rust has native generation of C bindings. Is there a big difference with C+±specific bindings?

      • snaggen@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you refer to bindgen it also supports C++, and since Mozilla who was the main driver of rust uses C++ I assume the bindgen for that is pretty good.

        • Knusper@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ah, thanks. I did not know that, but I figured, if C+±specific bindings make sense, then Mozilla would have built something for that, before working on UniFFI.