GOP presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy did not back down Sunday when questioned about comments he made during a campaign stop in Iowa Friday, calling Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.) part of the “modern KKK.”

“I stand by what I said to provoke an open and honest discussion in this country,” Ramaswamy said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

  • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    10 months ago

    Why am I seeing so many posts about this guy? Why are people giving him so much attention? He seems to be pulling straight from Trump’s playbook, playing the media to get constant attention, and people are falling for it.

    • ikapoz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      10 months ago

      For one simple and depressing reason - people click on it. That’s the dopamine button for modern media outlets online; those clicks are the cash register ringing.

      If you want to figure out a way to elevate the discourse you have to disrupt the payment model - at the end of the day people do what gets them paid. Doubly so when the harm it causes is anonymized by operating in corporate aggregates.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No one is getting paid to post the stuff here. They’re just falling for his bull shit.

        • ikapoz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Of course not, that isn’t what I mean. I’m taking about why media in general reports as “straight news” the inflammatory blathering of political figures. Whether you as the reader agree with it or not, these kind of statements in headlines get the publisher clicks.

          Clicks == revenue for for the media site, so they are incentivized to provide more content like that. Politicians need exposure more than just about anything, so they tend more towards that kind of language in part to get greater exposure through those venues.

          I don’t think people posting content like this to aggregators like lemmy are in that incentivizing loop directly, but users engaging with the content even if they hate does incentivize the behavior further(albeit in a very small, incremental way).

    • qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think you answered your own question. He’s playing the Trump bit. Saying extreme things to get news headlines and people talking about him. And it’s working to some extent.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        I guess I figured people would see through it by now. I also have a naive expectation that journalists will have some integrity and not fall for this stuff. The media handed Trump the election in 2016, by falling for his stuff, and if Trump is too wrapped up with this trial to see things through and is base starts to falter, it seems like the media and anointed Vivek to take them. He may be more dangerous than Trump, which is hard to believe.

      • Fades@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        media didn’t learn

        Oh they learned alright. They do this not because they didn’t learn their lesson but because they did. Actual journalism and reporting is ALWAYS second to shit articles that are wrong in order to be the first one out the door, click bait the article title, showcase the fascists for the rage bait, etc.

        They exist to make money and so the lessons learned revolve solely around finance. Whey would they learn anything else? This shit is working for them

  • MicroWave@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    10 months ago

    During his Friday appearance in Iowa, Ramaswamy accused Pressley, the first Black woman elected to represent Massachusetts in Congress, of racism and compared her to “modern grand wizards” of the Ku Klux Klan for comments she made in 2019, saying: “We don’t need any more Black faces that don’t want to be a Black voice.” Pressley clarified her remarks at the time, noting on social media that she “speaking to the collective impact of lifting up one’s lived experience, whatever that is.”

    Pressley, a progressive elected to the House in 2018, shot back on Saturday, calling the comments “harmful.”

    “We typically don’t engage in these bad-faith attacks but yesterday a line was crossed. A GOP candidate referred to Ayanna as ‘a modern grand wizard of the KKK’ because she speaks out against racial injustice,” Pressley’s team said in a fundraising pitch. “This is backwards and harmful, but that is the point.”

    • Kalcifer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      You conveniently left out what immediately followed that quote in the article:

      But on Sunday, Ramaswamy did not back down when he was repeatedly questioned about the comparison by Bash.

      “I think it is the same spirit to say that I can look at you and based on just your skin color, that I know something about the content of your character, that I know something about the content of the viewpoints you’re allowed to express,” Ramaswamy said, calling the rhetoric “divisive.”

  • Tedesche@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    This guy is fast proving he’s just a male MTG: shock jock politician trying bait reasonable people into engaging him and legitimizing him.

    And of course, the news outlets will spread every provocative thing he says far and wide for clicks.

    Fuck everything.

  • JoBo@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    It is so weird watching national politics being conducted in terms more fitting to a playground argument. And not just in the US, we’re getting a lot of it in the UK too. And I’m assuming it is similar everywhere the fash and their fellow travellers have gained some kind of platform in national politics.

    There were never “grown ups” in charge. But I miss them at least pretending to be serious. Or maybe it’s better that they’re so laughably bad, instead of cloaking equally dire arguments in more convincing rhetoric?

  • Pratai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Why does anyone care what this clown has to say? He’s irrelevant. Just ignore his bullshit and don’t let him get to you.

  • Yepthatsme@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    All these people have dinner with and fuck each other behind the scenes while they entertain us with bullshit attacks toward each other.