Was there an alternative adjective to “clockwise” other than “the rotation you take around left hand”?

Also, how did all watch companies around the world agree on what the direction of “clockwise” is?

  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It works, but it’s ambiguous. You have to specify which part you’re referring to if you want to be sure you’re understood.

    • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly the hardest concept for me to grasp in organic chemistry was left vs right chirality. I could understand why they were different, but fuck me if i could ever consistently identify them.

      • Nash42@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Turning right, looking at the top of the clock, is different from turning right while looking at the bottom of the clock. And so on.

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        No matter which direction a ball rolls, part of it moves to the right, and part to the left (either top right and bottom left, or vice versa). If you don’t specify which part of the ball you’re looking at, it could be either top or bottom, so the statement is ambiguous.

          • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            No, they are well-defined. There is no missing information in “clockwise”. There is missing information in “right”.

            There is no “top clockwise” or “bottom clockwise”.