• duncan@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in a city center, and frequently have loud cars drive past. Some are substantially worse than others. The loudest of them are so loud that when they go past I can’t hear my TV for 30 seconds or so, and that’s with my windows all closed and listening via headphones.

    Something really does need to be done to enforce the noise laws that are often being ignored.

  • sammer510 [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not really in favor of surveillance but it should be legal and socially acceptable to throw rocks at cars that have been straight piped. Fuck em. If you make your car louder on purpose you should be punished

  • AKADAP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some idiot is going to hang out near the camera with a boom box and play loud engine noises every time an electric vehicle drives by.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ll take the loud cars if we can get some real fucking regulations on headlight brightness so I don’t get blinded every time I drive at night.

    • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is already the regulation in the Highway Code:

      114: “You MUST NOT use any lights in a way which would dazzle or cause discomfort to other road users”

      The “MUST NOT” indicates that this is a legal requirement and so it is a criminal offense to disobey it. Now if we could get the police to actually ENFORCE the legal requirements in the Highway Code, then maybe things might improve on the roads.

      • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean if that’s the case then they have to enforce it on the companies as well because in 2023 it’s the default on many models on the road, not even with their brights or high beams on.

        • theplanlessman@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Just went down the legislation.gov rabbit hole, and it seems there are regulations on headlight height and angle that have been in place since 1989, but unfortunately no maximum power or brightness restrictions.

          Which means that although a driver could be fined for using excessively bright headlights, the manufacturer of the car could not be fined for making the car like that in the first place.

          Perhaps if things like these noise cameras gain in popularity it will encourage the lawmakers to look at other issues like this one.

  • Blake [he/him]@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Intentionally loud exhausts are obnoxious and selfish. As much as I dislike it, however, I’d far rather deal with the noise than having yet more surveillance. We’re already the #3 most surveilled country in the world, only the USA and China is worse.

    • Swarfega@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Harley Davidson bikes are just noise pollution. Unlike cars they are build like this out of the factory.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Electrics cars will make it a non issue but then we will be stuck with the surveillance. Our country is scary. No one cares.

      Having said that if you are intentionally being noisy for noisy sake there should be harder punishments. Even lose your license for a bit, it’s not a got given right to drive. You got to earn it.

      All drivers should be considerate of others

  • Hyggyldy@sffa.community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I never even considered that was an option. I figured loud jackasses was just something we’d have to live with.

  • G4Z@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know at my old house there was an ice cream van that made my life mildly more irritating as his chimes were on ear splittingly loud (guy must have drove with earplugs), and frankly I’d have loved it if somebody would have actually enforced the law (there is actually a law for ice cream van chimes) and an automated system like this would be one way!

  • bloopernova@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    (Apologies for USA centric comment)

    I think if that was proposed in the USA, people’s heads might actually explode. When 2 roundabouts were put in nearby, some people acted like the UN new world order was on its way. I grew up in Basingstoke so I love roundabouts. Thankfully people have come around to the idea.

    I’d support it just so my dog can walk near a road without some pickup gunning its engine as it flies past us. Any kind of traffic speed reduction is treated with fury over here.

    People with loud pipes don’t realize they look like a nobend and sound like this: https://youtube.com/shorts/s0xqopmjbSo?feature=share

    • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry - that’s not purely American. People here acted like the illuminati were on the march when a couple of ‘school streets’ were announced (no access during pick up/drop off hours

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m American and love roundabouts. I think my fellow drivers hate them because they require a small amount of thought and planning, which is too much to ask from your average American driver.

      • Treczoks@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Roundabouts are easy, and easy to learn. When I got my license, there were just three roundabouts in my state. Now there are three within two minutes of driving, and a fourth one is planned.

        Roundabouts are actually better than normal crossings for traffic flow and reducing the accident rate, but they require respect and consideration for the fellow traffic participants, so I don’t expect them to work in the US.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t they just deal with it at the MOT?

    Plus I’m pretty sure it would be pointless recording the noisy bollock whizzing up and down my road on his motorbike, because apparently number plates are optional when there’s fuck all police about.

    • Treczoks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The point is that most really loud cars are made to be loud. And usually equipped with a way to quickly undo that, if needed.

      I’ve seen a TV report on some policemen hunting “tuned” cars. They were following an obnoxiously loud car in an unmarked police car, stopped them, and took measurements - suddenly, the car was “just normal”. But they knew what they heard, and the measurements they had taken from a distance had been way louder than the measurements taken at a defined distance from the exhaust, so they impounded the car for further investigation. And found a switch in the glove compartment that changed the car from “normal” to “loud”.

      You’ve got to catch them red-handed. As long as they can disable or just quickly undo something like that before a MOT , it won’t get a single idiot and his car off the road.

  • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m on the fence. Daft custom exhaust on a 1.5 turbo 3cyl is stupid, but there’s no way I can agree to more surveillance.

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        In general I wouldn’t mind people having the freedom to make their cars impossible to sit any reasonable amount of time inside, but I don’t currently have a suggestion on how to make certain peeps be not assholes in residential areas.

        In regards to WRC - isn’t that world rally championship? I don’t think I’ve ever seen one happening anywhere near apartment buildings on single lane streets with cars parked on both sides and kids’ playground nearby.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.ukM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess it depends what your comfort level for surveillance is.
      In this case, it would likely be “camera activated at 96dBA, numberplate in view was BO55 MAN, NIP being sent to keepers address”

      • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be brilliant if it was this isolated. But it seems like every step in surveillance always leads to more surveillance. It’s always some innocent excuse, without ever drawing the full picture together with preexisting stuff.

        There’s now a generarion that has grown up without ever having experienced not being watched.