International Chess Federation, FIDE, has released new guidelines targeting transgender players. The guidelines would strip trans men’s titles, and potentially bar trans women from playing.
In recent months, the discussion surrounding transgender participation in sports has intensified. Several sports organizations have ruled that transgender women cannot participate in their competitions. This trend has expanded beyond traditional sports like swimming, touching even disc golf and billiards, based on perceived “advantages” of transgender athletes. The reaction to trans people in competition has grown to include non-sporting contests like beauty pageants and Jeopardy! after seeing transgender success. Now, FIDE, the world’s foremost international chess organization, has introduced guidelines that would revoke titles from transgender men and bar many transgender women from competing, asserting that trans women "have no right to participate.”
The regulations, reported online by French transgender FIDE master, Yosha Iglesias, spell out a list of policy changes that apply to transgender competition in chess. Among the policy changes:
Transgender men must relinquish their women-category titles after transitioning.
Transgender women can keep their previous titles.
Transgender women have “no right to compete” in the women’s division.
Transgender women will be “evaluated” by the FIDE Council on if they will be allowed to compete in a process that may take up to 2 years.
FIDE can mark transgender players as “transgender” in their files.
Gender changes must be “comply with the player’s national laws” and may include birth certificate documents (despite many nations refusing to change transgender birth certificates)
See the main page on transgender participation from the organization:
The unveiling of these regulations drew widespread ridicule, with numerous individuals challenging the notion that transgender women possess a “natural advantage” in chess. According to the chess news site Chessbase, the women’s category in chess exists to encourage increased participation among women, not because women inherently perform at a lower level in the game. Thus, the typical arguments against transgender women competing don’t hold water, as it’s implausible to claim that transgender women have an unfair advantage.
This isn’t the first instance of scrutiny regarding transgender participation in non-physical competitions. In 2022, transgender Jeopardy champion Amy Schneider set the record as the highest-winning woman in Jeopardy history. Following her success, several anti-trans voices online claimed she unfairly took the title from “real women,” suggesting that transgender women possess an inherent advantage in trivia over cisgender women.
The regulations are harmful and discriminatory towards transgender individuals. The logic behind revoking titles from transgender men transitioning from the women’s category is not explained anywhere in the document. Additionally, these rules would delay transgender women from competing for up to two years while their gender is examined, and could even prohibit them indefinitely. Given that the usual “unfair advantage” argument doesn’t logically apply in this context, these regulations appear to unfairly target transgender individuals while sidestepping even the usual arguments against trans competition.
The enforcement of these policies remains unclear. Iglesias took to Twitter, asking, “Am I woman enough?” She listed the FIDE council members, sharing photos that depict the majority as older cisgender men, adding, “these people will decide.” The documents don’t specify how decisions regarding a transgender member’s participation will be made. Until further clarity, transgender international chess players face uncertainty about their continued involvement in the sport.
Not sure why gender would even matter in chess. It seems weird to make the distinction, just let two people sit across from each other and play.
because chess has historically been an extremely misogynistic field (and still is, if not quite so overt), so there’s still a huge imbalance in the field, just like how women are underrepresented in tech.
Have had some convos about this with friends, they think it’s weird that chess is still segregated by gender but I gave them this rationalization, that to promote women it made sense to separate them as a temporary measure until women have equal standings. But now I’m not sure FIDE had separate categories for that reason at all, it really is just misogyny.
Eh, I think the misogyny is more just that the separate category itself isn’t a bad idea, but it’s not nearly enough oh its own, FIDE needs to actively work to stamp out misogyny from the “open” category, as it is now it’s just a pandering gesture to try and appear like it’s truly motivated to actually combat misogyny, it’s kinda like affirmative action here in the states vs. an actually progressive country where it’s just one small policy out of many.
That’s true and it’s why I considered it acceptable before, but if they truly believe women are equal to men in their ability to play chess why would they ever care about trans people being in the “wrong” category? It’s just a real headscratcher.
could just be more towards transphobia, in that they’re just actively trying to make sure they suffer even more, especially transwomen
The best thing about the chess boom that’s happened in the last few years is that normal people who do things like taking showers and going outside on a regular basis have become a much larger part of the community
No wonder
circlejerked about chess so hard for years and compared anything else they wanted to circlejerk about to dae le chess.
real, I like chess but god it would get so obnoxious
I don’t want to dislike it at all but the fandom is really shitty and has been shitty for a long time.
Before someone pulls a false equivalency, no, some fandoms are shittier than others, especially when the fandom makes the organization rules such as in chess.
do people really deny that? I wasn’t even aware that was a controversial statement…
Yes, and verbatim. It’s usually phrased as “all fandoms are just as good and bad as any other fandom” which is a staggeringly unlikely false equivalency.
I’m pretty sure stamp collectors aren’t known for Heated G!mer moments, for example.
I also doubt badminton is known for hooligan riots after tournaments.
what a weird take, it all just resolves around how the original creator/highest body chooses to set the tone, gaming fandoms that actively stomp on bigotry have just fine communities (relatively, at least), and all the worst ones you can think of are from like multiplayer games from companies who refuse to invest the money into actually changing the culture of their games.
The take doesn’t need evidence, its claims are broad and vague to an extreme just so every fandom and every fandom wrongdoing seems justified.
I’ve been trying to ignore this and learn to play online anyway and it’s rough. this decision from FIDE is the last straw for me and I’m giving up - this fanbase is just way too toxic to tolerate.