• HMH@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Assuming you read that article, what is your opinion of the above excerpt?

    The NHS Confederation acted overly cautious and obviously was wrong. The British healthcare system did not crumble under Omicron despite mandates being lifted. I am aware that the article is filled with warnings claiming Johnson is lifting mandates far too soon. And I am also convinced that this move was mostly politically motivated. But this does not mean that we can not look at the results of this decision. And these are clearly not as bad as many including the NHS Confederation predicted.

    you’re completely ignoring the points in time when COVID infection rates were considerably lower than the current point in time

    Yes, because the ratio of infections to hospitalizations has changed dramatically. What I look at is the pressure on the healthcare system. If healthcare can handle all patients just fine, I do not see a problem with lifting mandates. But clearly you disagree, is the reason for that indeed that you fear COVID still does a lot of damage even if you do not get hospitalized?

    Why do you just happen to use mandates being lifted as evidence that COVID should be taken less seriously

    What are you talking about, I did not even mention the severity of COVID in this thread?

      • HMH@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Really bad takes here.

        Why? Do you think we can actually prevent a significant amount of people from catching COVID-19 in the first place by keeping very strict mandates? Or do you also fear that repeatedly catching COVID-19 might do serious damage to your body?