I’ve read that at the center of large celestial bodies there’s zero gravity (or close to). While confirmation would be nice, if true, I’m wondering how large that area can actually be and moreover, does it scale up with more mass and/or even size - that is, does the sun have a larger center area of low (zero?) gravity than the earth and so on with evermore mass. Or is that area the same regardless of mass’ size?

Thank you

    • FlowVoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not quite. If by “edge” you mean the surface of the earth, then the force of gravity from the closer edge will always exactly offset the gravity from the farther edge. So if the earth were hollow, then you would experience zero gravity at any point in the hollow portion.

      Of course, the earth is not hollow. And any mass under you (i.e. closer to the center than you are) will not be offset, and all of it will pull you towards the center. As you move further away from the center, more of the earth’s mass will be closer to the center than you and therefore the force of gravity will increase.

    • Jeredin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for replying.

      This feels very close to answering the question in a way my brain can interpret it. So, going outward makes complete sense to me but the area at the center, the way I under your answer is, yes, the area or zone will increase proportional to its mass?

      This may be asking too much, but, have any idea the size of that low gravity zone of earth bs our Sun?

        • Jeredin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I guess I don’t know enough about the equations necessary to solve for a gradient of area at the exact center, equal to it’s surrounding mass.

          All the same, thank you for replying. Seems like the area might not be as large as I had supposed.

  • FlowVoid@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Inside a sphere of constant density, gravity is linearly related to distance from the center.

    So for example the Earth has a radius of ~4000 miles. Assuming it has constant density, a 200 pound man would be weightless at its center, weigh 0.2 pounds at 4 miles from the center, weigh 2 pounds at 40 miles from the center, weigh 100 pounds at halfway to the surface, and so on.

    • Jeredin@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So for the Sun, taking its density/pressure into account, will the same gravity gradient exist but on a much larger scale?

      Thank you

      • FlowVoid@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        A linear relationship would exist if the sun were uniform in density, but it isn’t.

        Though there is still a nonlinear change in gravity as you approach the center of the sun.

        • Jeredin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So the larger the star, given that most (or all) aren’t uniform, there will come a gradient of gravity at its center that one can’t even call it low gravity - it’s heavy material is simply churning too much for their to be a stable center of gravity?

          • FlowVoid@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the best way to visualize it is that when you are inside a star, you are effectively “standing” on a smaller star. Everything behind you can theoretically be ignored. When you are very close to the center, you are standing on a very tiny star.

            • Jeredin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              So instead of the hole density from one side to the other, I only have the density from the center to its surface, am I understanding that correctly?

              • FlowVoid@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’m not sure what you mean by “surface”.

                Imagine you are standing on the surface of Earth, and you weighed 200 pounds.

                Now imagine Earth were magically transported to the center of the sun, completely replacing an equal volume of solar core. Inside the very middle of the sun, standing on planet earth, you would still weigh 200 pounds. The gravity of all the solar mass surrounding the Earth would cancel out.

                If you traveled upwards, to the surface of the sun, your weight would increase. At the sun’s surface, you would weigh 5400 pounds.

  • octoperson@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you had a planet that was hollow in the center*, the entire hollow region would have zero gravity. You could have a thin-skinned planet with the entire interior an empty weightless void. I doubt any planets like this actually exist.

    * Assuming radial symmetry. If you can represent the planet as concentric spherical shells then you’re good.