Alfa@lemmy.worldcake to ChatGPT@lemmy.world · 11 months agochatGpt is no longer Artificial Intelligence but Genuine Stupiditychat.openai.comexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1129arrow-down116
arrow-up1113arrow-down1external-linkchatGpt is no longer Artificial Intelligence but Genuine Stupiditychat.openai.comAlfa@lemmy.worldcake to ChatGPT@lemmy.world · 11 months agomessage-square46fedilink
minus-squareSimpleDev@infosec.pubcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-211 months agoNow it’s broken, I guess I I don’t use it this way often enough. Interesting nonetheless! Edit - it’s very semantic, it matters if I include an uppercase “S” or not. That’s amusing. I wonder if the temperature settings adjustment would fix that or just make it even weirder.
minus-squarenieceandtows@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·11 months agoThe original reply included both s(2) and S(10) in it
minus-squareSimpleDev@infosec.pubcakelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-211 months agoBut it’s able to correct unlike what’s shown in the OP messages. Extremely semantically it seems but it clearly listens. It’s neat to see how different each person experience is. Also different tuning parameters etc…could make outputs different. That might explain why mine is seemingly a bit better at listening.
Now it’s broken, I guess I I don’t use it this way often enough. Interesting nonetheless!
Edit - it’s very semantic, it matters if I include an uppercase “S” or not. That’s amusing.
I wonder if the temperature settings adjustment would fix that or just make it even weirder.
The original reply included both s(2) and S(10) in it
But it’s able to correct unlike what’s shown in the OP messages.
Extremely semantically it seems but it clearly listens. It’s neat to see how different each person experience is.
Also different tuning parameters etc…could make outputs different. That might explain why mine is seemingly a bit better at listening.