• bob_wiley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sure, but they developed that way. Instantly ending all vehicle travel will lead to mass death before things can reorganize in a way to support life without them again. Changing entire supply chains and social structures doesn’t happen overnight.

      • bob_wiley@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m not sure I see your point. They made a shitty design decisions and over the course of decades the city changed as that design was implemented. That’s very different than eliminating what has become critical infrastructure overnight.

        Eliminating cars overnight would be the same as taking all the stores, hospitals, and everything out of a small walking-centric town, putting those things 50 miles away, with no roads, trails, or transportation to get there. Those services would be inaccessible and people would die. It would take time to make that transition. It takes similar planning and care to make the transition back away from roads and cars. I don’t see how that’s a controversial statement.

    • HardlightCereal@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think we can make the transition safely over the next 5 years if everyone genuinely treats this as a #1 priority. And it is a #1 priority, because the human species is going extinct if we don’t reduce our fossil fuel emissions to ZERO.

    • wsweg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ban cars and force the entire US population into a Kowloon-type city. Boom, easy fix! /s