stoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoTwitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checkswww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square113fedilinkarrow-up1700arrow-down145
arrow-up1655arrow-down1external-linkTwitter Blue subscribers can now hide their blue checkswww.theverge.comstoiclime@lemm.ee to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square113fedilink
minus-squarecountsickness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up76·1 year agoSo I guess now you can get your tweets pushed without disclosing that you payed for it…?
minus-squarejupiter_jazz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoAh that makes more sense.
minus-squarecountsickness@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoI am asking myself the same thing. But unless it’s actually advertising I guess the answer is yes. Might get interesting with twitter gold or whatever color the brand checkmate is.
minus-squarejonne@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoTwitter can do whatever the hell they want on their own website. They have no obligation to be fair in whatever they decide to boost or hide (with the exception of outright illegal content, obviously).
minus-squareanyone_yun@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoThat must be the true reason behind this move
minus-squareanlumo@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoThey’re Xes, not tweets.
So I guess now you can get your tweets pushed without disclosing that you payed for it…?
That’s a bingo
“We just say bingo”
Ah that makes more sense.
Is this actually legal?
I am asking myself the same thing. But unless it’s actually advertising I guess the answer is yes.
Might get interesting with twitter gold or whatever color the brand checkmate is.
Twitter can do whatever the hell they want on their own website. They have no obligation to be fair in whatever they decide to boost or hide (with the exception of outright illegal content, obviously).
That must be the true reason behind this move
They’re Xes, not tweets.