China and India were the most important places on Earth for almost all of history. The “Near East,” the “Far East,” Africa, and the Americas all had advanced empires at times, and most outstripped Europe technologically for most of history. The Ottomans famously made use of gunpowder before Europeans, but the Chinese were (of course) the first to weaponize it.

So what enabled Europeans to so successfully dominate the world? Obviously it wasn’t their exceptional genetics or superior “culture,” or even, I think, the massive experience in organized murder from Europeans all killing each other. Was it Capitalism? Industrialization? Agriculture? Did the massive trade network encompassing half the globe create a population with a huge array of immune disease carriers?

Notably, the “Scramble for Africa” happened much later than the settling of the Americas. Did the wealth sucked out of the Americas allow the Europeans to do something that would’ve been previously impossible (or at least not worth the effort)?

I know this is kind of a massive question to answer and I’m sure it’s very contested, but I’d appreciate any responses and any book recommendations.

  • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    England was an island

    The Moroccans destroyed the Songhai Empire

    Spanish diseases wiped out 90% of the population of the Americas

    Did the wealth sucked out of the Americas allow the Europeans to do something that would’ve been previously impossible (or at least not worth the effort)?

    Yes, but this has to be paired with the super profits of the Atlantic Slave trade, equivalent of $1 investment resulting in $1700 of profit, nothing in economic history has come close to it