A search for Threads content on Twitter currently brings up zero results, despite plenty of links to Meta’s microblogging rival being posted on the platform.

  • Drewfro66
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    365
    ·
    1 year ago

    Elon Musk runs the whole of Twitter like the jealous, power-drunk moderator of a small 5,000-member Discord server.

    • MetaPhrastes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      People are free to either agree with the CEO view or to not use the platform. Sad but true. At least it reminds us all that it is a private for-profit company and always has been. No matter whether the “value” of it was mostly provided by user-created contents.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s kind of a good example as to why the “benevolent dictator” idea is fundamentally flawed—you don’t really get two benevolent dictators in succession unless you’re incredibly lucky, and doesn’t matter how lucky you are, you’re not getting three in a row

        • Ulu-Mulu-no-die@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s not even that, free speech is about the government, not private entities, it’s about not being arrested for what you say, it has nothing to do with what private companies do on their platforms, they’re free to do what they want and they’re not limiting any free speech by doing so because they’re not the government.

          It’s baffling how many people still don’t understand that and go on crying about free speech related to private entities.

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          the constitution allows you

          I thought the point of the constitution was that it confirms existing rights, not allows or forbids something. While the usual laws do allow or forbid.

          Free speech in the web was really funny in the 00s, when moderators could partake in long discussions about it, and then just ban somebody for looking at them wrong (figuratively).

      • SJ_Zero@lemmy.fbxl.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        35
        ·
        1 year ago

        He’s done everyone a few favors. He showed us that the government sticks it’s fingers into social media in ways that are illegal, and he also showed us that corpos aren’t a good alternative because they’ll stick their fingers into social media in ways that are legal.

        Decentralization and self-hosting is ultimately the only protection against forces that want to force us to see what they want us to see and nothing else.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe he is aware of that, but wants to remind us all how internet communities were in the 00s.

      Banning people for mentioning competing platforms just brings nostalgic tears.

      Or maybe he doesn’t, just all the benevolence social media owners would show goes down the pipe when there really are decentralized alternatives which work. When they didn’t feel threatened, they could seem wiser.

      • xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe he is aware of that, but wants to remind us all how internet communities were in the 00s.

        This i don’t know. Any news references or links?

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s like asking for news references for somebody being kicked out of a bar (doesn’t matter whether it’s unjust).

          It just was a common thing - posting links to competitor sites gets you disciplined and possibly banned. Of course, competition was not for money, but for people. Cause if nobody comes to your site, then your ego is hurt and you’re depressed. Also posts advertising other people’s sites spoil the mood in general, contributing nothing.

          EDIT: There were also friendly\allied sites, of course. With little banners somewhere at the bottom of the page leading to those.