You must take a look at the context this reply was made. It is a reply to “taliban is still no emancipatory movement”
lemmy devs argues that stating that Taliban is not an emacipatory movement is “setting a pretty high bar”.
Taliban is still no emancipatory movement! and that’s not setting any bar to high or something. Taliban is ultra-right theocracy. He is downplaying the horrors Talibans are doing.
He also argues that, “Before there can be emancipation, they need peace”, and in the current situation, that means that in order to reach emancipation, women must obey to Taliban rules.
Is not “supporting” the Taliban at all. You seem to be on a personal crusade against the Lemmy devs.
You must take a look at the context this reply was made. It is a reply to “taliban is still no emancipatory movement”
lemmy devs argues that stating that Taliban is not an emacipatory movement is “setting a pretty high bar”.
Taliban is still no emancipatory movement! and that’s not setting any bar to high or something. Taliban is ultra-right theocracy. He is downplaying the horrors Talibans are doing.
He also argues that, “Before there can be emancipation, they need peace”, and in the current situation, that means that in order to reach emancipation, women must obey to Taliban rules.
See my reply in the other thread: https://lemmy.ml/post/77978/comment/76352