28-Year-Old Dutch Woman to Legally End Her Life in May.

A Dutch woman has decided to legally end her life citing her struggles with crippling depression and autism, according to a report. Zoraya ter Beek, a 28-year-old physically healthy, who lives in a small village in the Netherlands near the German border, is slated to be euthanised in May, according to the New York Post (NYP).

The Dutch woman said she decided to be euthanised after her doctors told her nothing more could be done to improve her condition.

Didn’t we use to try to prevent people who were depressed from committing suicide?

The World has turned into a Monty Python skit.

  • multitotalOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Now it’s just insults… Don’t take disagreement personally. Read the sidebar.

    The psychopaths are the psychiatrists who propose suicide as a cure for depression. That’s par for the course for a discipline that started off as caretakers of zoos for the “insane”, graduated to torture and then performed lobotomies into the 70s and 80s, among other sick and twisted “treatments” (like the removal of teeth).

    The worst part of it is that they pretend to care and say it is all for the good of the patient. Now that’s true psychopathy!

    to force a person to suffer every moment of every day for likely the rest of their life (or at least a greater portion of it)

    Living is the default, nobody is forcing anybody to do anything. Besides, if she was so sure in her decision to die, why doesn’t she go off into the woods and hang herself? She needs psychiatrists to encourage her and convince her it is the right thing to do. It’s fucked up.

    political agenda

    Ah yes, the political agenda of telling people they have the power to change material conditions instead of just killing themselves. How evil and manipulative!

    Everyone suffers under capitalism, that’s why we’re communists, to end or greatly reduce that suffering. The easy way to end that suffering would be for everyone to just die. Isn’t that silly though? You don’t fix a broken clock by smashing it, you don’t improve a meal by throwing it in the trash.

    • SomeGuy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      No one is arguing that her doctors made the right call in this instance or that modern mental health treatment isn’t fucked thanks to capitalism. I’m just arguing that in general, suicide is a valid treatment for those who wish for it. Your entire argument was to try and force them to be a soldier for the revolution as if that somehow invalidates their suffering.

      You want to restrict her access to suicide yes? Congratulations, you’re forcing her to stay alive by restricting her ability to do the contrary.

      It is manipulative to prey on the mentally ill (one of the most vulnerable groups in society) for political reasons regardless of how noble or great you think such political positions are. If you cannot reconize that simple fact you are equally as monstrous as a military recruiter who preys on the poor.

      Also that little blurb at the end is just silly. Especially when your food analogy doesn’t even make sense as fucked up food is often fucked in ways that cannot be fixed. You can’t unburn a steak. Ofcourse I’m not saying that life or whatever is unfixable (though that seems to be how you’ll take it). I’m just saying your choice of analogy is poor.

      • multitotalOPM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        You want to restrict her access to suicide yes?

        No. If she wants to kill herself she can jump off a building. I want to restrict doctors from suggesting and encouraging suicide as a “treatment”.

        I’m just arguing that in general, suicide is a valid treatment for those who wish for it.

        That’s basically saying that thoughts of suicide are valid and healthy and that people should act on them if they so wish. Now that’s fucked up.

        Saying it is “preying” on the mentally ill for political reasons is like saying it is “preying” on the poor for political reasons. Like wtf? Should poor people also not be radicalised and agitated because they have other things to worry about?

        If you cannot reconize that simple fact you are equally as monstrous as a military recruiter who preys on the poor.

        That’s really fucking disingenuous, because by that logic communists also “prey” on the poor for political reasons, yet you used the example of military recruiters.

        Do you think communists should only “recruit” among those who have all their mental health in order? Who the hell would that leave?

        Everyone in capitalism is “mentally ill”, be it from anxiety, depression, stress, and so on. Capitalism makes people mentally ill, that’s an effect it has on people. That’s why “the mentally ill”, much like poor people and other marginalised groups have a vested interest in abolishing it and establishing something better.

        • SomeGuy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          While I don’t believe doctors should encourage it, it should be an option on the table. That is what I’m saying.

          Everyone gets dark thoughts from time to time. Be it hurting someone, hurting themselves, engaging in reckless behavior. These are normal thoughts. Yet anytime someone brings up suicide suddenly its a whole production. I’m not saying constant suicidal thoughts are healthy exactly, but they are often quite reasonable given an individual’s condition so they shouldn’t be shamed either. Shaming will only make it worse.

          You’re right, you shouldn’t prey on anyone. There is a big difference between preying on someone and simply talking with them and giving them the information they need to make their own decision. Your wording made it seem as though you wanted to target such people to try and trick them into joining. Now, approaching people with problems and discussing our solutions is perfectly normal. The difference comes in how the decision to join comes about. You read as if you wanted to pressure such people in with promises of pie in the sky like a cult leader. Instead of simple approaching them as an equal. Its worse with mentally Ill people because our minds are already a bit fucked and another manipulator trying to use that to try and get us to do something for them is not going to help matters.

          • multitotalOPM
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m not saying constant suicidal thoughts are healthy exactly, but they are often quite reasonable given an individual’s condition so they shouldn’t be shamed either.

            Having those thoughts is understandable, what’s not is acting on them. The goal is to remove the conditions and factors that make the person have those thoughts, rather than having the person stop living altogether.

            as though you wanted to target such people to try and trick them into joining

            People have different reasons for becoming communists and socialists because their material conditions vary. So if we are to develop class consciousnesses, we have to change our tactics. If we want a bourgeoise person to become a class traitor, it wouldn’t make sense to appeal to their sense of financial struggle because they’ve never experienced it.

            You read as if you wanted to pressure such people in with promises of pie in the sky like a cult leader

            The only promise is change, a different world. We can’t promise it will be different, the “promise” of communism has always been the overthrow of capitalism, of the current order of things, and the power to build something else. Lenin and the Bolsheviks promised “peace, land and bread” because that’s what the people wanted.

            another manipulator trying to use that to try and get us to do something for them

            The point is to empower people so they think they can do something for themselves. Committing suicide is the opposite of that. Suicide is the resolution of contradictions in capitalism’s favour.

            • SomeGuy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              No capitalist healthcare system is able to alter life conditions. A doctor can’t exactly prescribe a raise or a paid vacation. Ofcourse under socialism this may change but as of now a medically assisted suicide is better than forcing someone to suffer alone which is the only other option capitalism would provide.

              There is a difference between adapting to different people’s personal conditions to make effective arguments and deception.

              You can say goals, however you know for a fact that capitalism isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Socialism is still a historical epoch away.

              You should empower people to think for themselves, not to be cogs on a new machine. Blindly being cogs is why the USSR got screwed so fast after Stalin left. Leadership became unresponsive and this caused the populace to distrust the government overtime leading to the re-emergence of capitalism later.

              • multitotalOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                No capitalist healthcare system is able to alter life conditions. A doctor can’t exactly prescribe a raise or a paid vacation.

                Neither can an electrician, but they aren’t offering to electrocute a person to death as an alternative.

                as of now a medically assisted suicide is better than forcing someone to suffer alone which is the only other option capitalism would provide.

                It is better to struggle against the system that put one in such a position than accept medically assisted suicide.

                you know for a fact that capitalism isn’t going anywhere anytime soon.

                No, I most certainly don’t know that for a fact. Capitalism is very unstable. During covid, the economy ground to a halt and capitalists were afraid the whole economic system might collapse, which is why they forced governments to pay people anyway even if they weren’t working, something unheard of pre-covid. Every few years there’s a recession/risk of depression. We’re very close to a world war.

                “There are decades when nothing happens, and there are weeks when decades happen.”

                Socialism is still a historical epoch away.

                Epochs are labels we use in retrospect to delineate and talk about periods in the past. We cannot use an “epoch” to measure time in the future.

                You should empower people to think for themselves,

                Suicide is the cessation of thinking, by definition.

                • SomeGuy
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Better to fight than accept death certainly but death should always be an option on the table for those who are done fighting. Every soldier retires eventually.

                  Unstable on the scale of nations means within 100 years or so. So sure, potentially within our lifetimes capitalism will go away but its fair to say it won’t be within 10 years. Why? Because socialism is still wildly unpopular. We at least need people to be willing to accept our presence in daily life but even that isn’t gonna happen. If a communist revolution took over the government a good 75% of my country would be fully counter revolutionary, maybe 20% neutral, and the rest would view it as an improvement (not necessarily support, but at least think its a better direction than the past, less than 1% would actually support the new government). It’ll take a century shoved into a week before people here actually fight. Maybe your country is closer to revolution and if so I’m happy for you and hope it succeeds.

                  Sure, but if they chose to enter that state on their own volition I see no reason to inhibit them.

                  • multitotalOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    its fair to say it won’t be within 10 years.

                    We have no way of knowing that.

                    Why? Because socialism is still wildly unpopular.

                    Yeah, now.

                    “During a revolution, millions and tens of millions of people learn in a week more than they do in a year of ordinary, somnolent life. For at the time of a sharp turn in the life of an entire people it becomes particularly clear what aims the various classes of the people are pursuing, what strength they possess, and what methods they use.” https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/sep/06.htm

                    People can change their minds rather quickly.

                    In the American revolution, 1/3 of the people wanted it, 1/3 were against it and 1/3 didn’t care either way. At least that’s what I remember reading in Howard Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States. You don’t need 100% (or the majority) of the people to be on our side at the start of the revolution.